Message from @Horns
Discord ID: 430134261547401226
SO I DO NOT FORESEE ANYTHING BUT AN ARISTOCRATIC RETURN
OTHERWISE WE ARE STILL IN THE MODERN MUDDLE
There is no "we".
You are a tiny group of people writing on a blog hardly anyone reads.
And you can't even formulate an actual theory.
"deeply critical of modern methods"
Written by a self-proclaimed nihilist and Nietzschean.
You use Evola's language without understanding what it means.
It involves rejecting muh realism.
In favor of "intellectual intuition".
Beholding the presence of God in the mind.
AND YOU ARE HERE TO HOLD MY PENIS AND SHOW ME THE RIGHT WAY?
FANTASTIC
I WILL DELEGATE MY STAFF TO TAKE NOTES
Unlike your collection of servile INTJ cohosts, I've actually read these authors.
The discussion group Everitt Foster held on evola reached no deeper than the hypocrisy of modernity and equality.
Which everyone who would attend would already know anyway.
Even in regards to the more pragmatic sides of Evola, I've never seen anyone discuss his "apoliticism" in relation to the errors the alt-right made regarding Trump.
Nor his explicit repudiation of mass-movements as a foundational method.
They just meme RIDE THAT TIGER BRO
In that sloganeering bit you just did, Evola himself would fall under what you label "THERE ARE THOSE WHO WANT TO RIDE DOWN THE COLLAPSE"
Even staying at the pragmatic level, he also explicitly repudiated enclavism and biological reductionism.
You have a problem when you list people like Evola and Nietzsche as high influences and do the opposite of what they said.
Without confronting it.
He also believed individuality was grounded in a hierarchy which began with the universal and proceeded to the specific.
The divine (God) --> Imperial Churchwarriors ---> Local State ---> Tribe ---> Human
From high to low
It is the Divine that is the Real.
A human becomes an Individual to the extent that he is able to foreground himself in the Divine Real and act from it on the material plane.
The Imperium on down can decay and crash, but the Divine fire remains.
Which is why his work moved toward Perennialism and Guenon.
Explicitly rejecting empiricism in favor of "intellectual intuition", which in Guenon's form is close to meaning "revelation".
Via serious, grounded belief in a Traditional Religion.
And conveyed via initiated circles, as the official religions decay.
From the Evolan point of view, the alt right is Titanic chair re-arranging.
And Nietzche would just think it's what he wrote about Forster.
So that seems to me a problem.
I'll probably get some all-caps slogan and banned.
Used to it by now.
Ride that tiger.