Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 430390447722987530
To reduce the % of the white population.
When people are going around saying they want less white people and NOT getting arrested, that sounds MUCH more believable.
WELFARE IS A SUBSIDY TO MAKE THE POOR EQUAL
AND ALSO TO BUY THEIR LOYALTY
SO THEY DO NOT REVOLT
NO ONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO WITH THE UNDERCLASS
When will people get it? THE POOR DON'T DESERVE STUFF JUST FOR BEING POOR
I believe in justice, but if people get free stuff because of the colour of their skin or their gender while I have to work for stuff, THAT'S unfair.
The world isn't perfect. And frankly, I wouldn't want it to be. A perfect world would be boring. But I don't want to live in a world where people can go anywhere with no control, you can be censored for wrongthink, and you're constantly being shamed for your qualities.
DIVERSITY CAN NEVER WORK
OUR EGALITARIANISM PROBLEM STARTED AMONG OUR OWN PEOPLE
LOWER CASTES WANTED TO OVERTHROW HIGHER
What's next, spreading talent fairly? "Hey, you're not allowed to be so good at languages or drawing! Give me half your talent!"
OR JUST: WE WILL REDUCE STANDARDS AND REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE HIGHER TALENT
BIEBER > BEETHOVEN
THIS IS HYSTERICAL AND SHOULD BE A SIGN OF OUR DEMISE
ADHD
You should get that looked at.
HUMANITY IS DOOMED TO FAIL AND I DON'T WANT TO GO DOWN WITH IT
ITS BEST HOPE IS WESTERN CIVILIZATION
AND ALL CAPS 😉
I thought Israel was the model.
This isn't the place to discuss that.
People here are too limited to see that commonality.
Get married
Bad modernist advice
"You should get married" people must be dismissed as completely incompetent
I'm sooooo tired of hearing advices from people who have no idea about how life works, but think they figure it all out beecause it says so in some manual from 19th century that upholds Old Testament as the ultimate wisdom
Actually, they all get it all wrong, even radical Traditionalists of today tend to get it all wrong no matter how much Evola himself told them that they cannot uphold something that doesnt have *The individual and his determination as a premise at all*
Hey there fellow proponent of the "moral Universe". What if I told you that you determination not to follow your sexual instincts *DOES NOT CHANGE ONE GOD DAMN THING ABOUT THE NATURE OF YOUR INSTINCT AT ALL, AND THAT YOUR DECISION IS A MERE VERBAL STATEMENT*
Even if you don't have sex to the end of your life, your sexual instinct remains completely and wholly unaltered. The only difference is that you do not even attempt to comprehend nothing about it, or about any other physiological precondition of human life, so that you can derive *actual spiritual instruction from it*
The premise of all morality is the triumph of the morally victorious, not individual wishful thinking
WE WUZ KANGZ
In fact, I'm writing about this atm so I'll keep my conclusions within that
WUZ