Message from @Arthur Konrad

Discord ID: 432686558177525761


2018-04-08 22:35:07 UTC  

The Great German Empire, and all following iterations of it, were more or less also well - *Empires* and included not only "Deutsche" people, but also other Germanic peoples, such as Valoons, Flandrians, Dutch, Swiss, Lombardians, and others

2018-04-08 22:38:15 UTC  

The reason these dimwits today so fancy China is probably because they are on the same intellectual level as these Chinese cronies in their burning desire to make everything on this sorry planet a "nation" - ONE UNDER GOD presumed !

2018-04-08 22:39:34 UTC  

To have nations 1.0, one must beforehand destroy everything that truly is *natio*, that truly is of *birth*, authentic and non-fabricated

2018-04-08 22:42:18 UTC  

Does the humor of your position elude you? Think of it: You made Negroes into a nation! I rest my case!

2018-04-08 23:21:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/267086373285134338/432681321064824852/maxresdefault-1.jpg

2018-04-08 23:30:34 UTC  

@Arthur Konrad I THINK MOST CONFUSE NATION-STATES WITH NATIONS, YES

2018-04-08 23:30:41 UTC  

THEY CANNOT THINK OUTSIDE THE PARADIGM OF GOVERNMENT

2018-04-08 23:30:49 UTC  

IT IS AMAZING TO SEE HOW MODERNIZED THEY HAVE BECOME

2018-04-08 23:31:03 UTC  

THE SOLUTION IS TO ARTICULATE THIS CLEARLY THROUGH LINK BETWEEN GENETICS, CULTURE, AND TRIBAL IDENTITY

2018-04-08 23:31:12 UTC  

PAN-NATIONALISM IS GOOD; RACIAL NATIONALISM IS CONFUSED

2018-04-08 23:31:18 UTC  

NATIONALISM WAS NEVER RACIAL, ONLY ETHNIC

2018-04-08 23:31:42 UTC  

THERE IS A BIT OF AN EXCEPTION FOR SIMILAR TRIBES THAT LIKE TO COEXIST, AS IN THE GERMANS AND THE U.K. (TO A DEGREE... NO IRISH!)

2018-04-08 23:36:32 UTC  

racial nationalism sounds even less sane than the concept of "ethno-nationalism as an ideology"

2018-04-08 23:36:47 UTC  

I do not know what is so difficult to comprehend about the simple principle of subsidiarity

2018-04-08 23:37:01 UTC  

Race is a widder and more *complex* concept than nation

2018-04-08 23:37:42 UTC  

Racial concept has more implications, that is, it *implies* more meanings, and quite incidentally, is *more exclusive* but also more elusive

2018-04-08 23:38:47 UTC  

Let me demonstrate through another example the European folly concerning other nations

2018-04-08 23:39:17 UTC  

The European amazement that there are "1.2 billion Chinese". "oh moofuggah, how did onen ation manage to multiply to such a number?!!?!"

2018-04-08 23:39:53 UTC  

Well, simply by the virtue of the fact that *many nations got included in the Chinese STATE by the virtue of its expansion*

2018-04-08 23:41:16 UTC  

The exact same principle led to formation of other entities, such as certain European nation-states as well. And in fact, that is no problem whatsoever in itself on the plane of mere matter-of-fact state

2018-04-08 23:41:54 UTC  

It becomes a problem though when this matter-of-fact state is converted into ideology *and then preached as a moral paradigm of the universe, or worse, as something GOOD IN ITSELF, or yet even worse, AS SOMETHING THAT PRODUCES GOOD RESULTS*

2018-04-08 23:58:23 UTC  

"watch, as a European spotted in the wild is in awe and amazement at the sight of a large state formation"

2018-04-09 14:52:19 UTC  

The concept of a
Nation hasn't any use
Before the 19th
Century and involved
Bringing together disparate
Ancestral dynasties which
Are called races and yet
These familial lines had
Historically very little
Opposition to unification of
Diverse regional races or
Intermixing royal blood to
Secure material possessions
Frankly, conservatism is,
unbearably,
myopic.

2018-04-09 18:33:06 UTC  

"NATION" MEANS TRIBE

2018-04-09 18:33:15 UTC  

IT SHOWS UP IN TRANSLATION LONG BEFORE THE 19TH CENTURY

2018-04-09 18:42:05 UTC  

BOTH INTERESTING

2018-04-09 19:04:41 UTC  

why?

2018-04-09 19:11:18 UTC  

There is no purpose in "denialism" concerning nations. You cannot prevent anybody to consider himself allied to a national body, in fact, it is pretty much a mundane task alltogether. We speak about political, philosophical and *historical-materialist principles*. Much in the same way that "ethno-nationalists" insist that nation is only organic, they also have to realize that formations larger than a "tribal" state are also perfectly organic. Remember this core principle - *states expand faster than nations and other groups*

2018-04-09 19:13:59 UTC  

Furthermore, all large state formations tend to, quite opposite of what ethno-nationalists claim, to *allow smaller groups to live in more or less self-determined communities*. The problem is, as Nietzsche has quite correctly observed, that Europeans, having once lost their large state formations, like Holy Roman Empire, Roman Empire, Frankish Empire, etc, started to proclaim their lacking of such formations into a virtue, and in the same fashion, declare such large state formations as inherently immoral

2018-04-09 19:16:09 UTC  

All large state formations were therefore a prior declared as deficient *in principle*. Naturally, the only remaining large state formation in Europe, Russian Empire, was a chief scare in Europe on that account alone. Needless to say, it was the only state that acted in a military and expansionist fashion *unapologetically* and chose as its chief target the Ottoman Empire, that other European powers always approached with consideration.

2018-04-09 19:19:01 UTC  

Again, Nietzsche has *once more* correctly pointed out - large state formations are nothing but manifestations of the vital principle *that simply has to express itself in conquest*. If it does not, decadence and decay ensues, manifested in *civilian* mentality and social "struggles". He lamented the fact that The West did not have such a state *in order for Europe to start expanding outside its geographic borders* and he saw Russian Empire as the only state in Europe in his time to be seen in favourable light.

2018-04-09 23:25:14 UTC  
2018-04-09 23:26:54 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/267086373285134338/433045173409153024/IMG_20180409_145858.jpg

2018-04-10 02:27:53 UTC  

I NEED TO EDIT THAT IMAGE SO THE IRON BALLS SAY "THE IRISH" AND "FEMALE SUFFRAGE"

2018-04-10 03:03:02 UTC  

we're gonna need 2 more balls. i think one should say 14th amendment and the other "civil rights"