https://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/why-do-we-need-to-know-that-people-who.html

this is pretty metal

or maybe more grindcore 🤔

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Da78YuJVwAEGPBL.jpg

Probably a few sexual positions to be taken advantage of for whoever the owner of that chair is.

LIBERTARIANISM GIVES YOU AIDS AND GARY JOHNSON.

https://youtu.be/JOvCz8Nw6Dw

https://i.redditmedia.com/Us5IAcUhSEELtZOwPWDoYutmQn8CgmcVu8wNd4_p7mk.jpg?w=282&s=4de163b0a2527309dbc3812b4965bfc0

God, blacks are lame

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBqtQjJqSQw

Russia is a third world country because of communism

and Ghengis Khan

https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/04/the-suburb-wooing-millennials-with-avocados-kombucha-and-cheap-houses/557414/

http://weev.net/an-open-letter-to-christopher-cantwell/

So much drama

True

I made the mistake today of being curious about some Baked Alaska/Metokur spat, and watched some of the recorded stream

Huge waste of everything

Don't even know who metokur is

I generally pay attention to what weev has to say tho

Yeah, he does have worthwhile things to say

It seems like every alt-right or related public figure has either made a serious acusation against another, or has been the subject of one, and there is an interlocking network of acusations such that there's no way to disentangle it and even pick a "side", because within any subset of alt-right figures there is some animosity between at least two of them

I suppose some degree of this is to be expected; normal people don't talk about these taboo topics, so it's left to the real weridos

I don't mean to be dismissive of weev's article, maybe he's right, but I'm just going to sidestep the whole issue by not "trusting" Internet celebrities or pretending they're leaders and instead I'll support and promote the good things they say when they say them

the strength is to not have leaders

we can have all the Alt Right High School drama we want, ti's fun. it's a social scene too

but no leaders to be targeted

the leaders are exactly who need to be targetted

since most of them are idiots like cantwell

There should be a distinction between thought leaders, movement leaders, and organizational leaders

And they should be held to high standards, but specifically standards that are relevant to their position

Everyone is flawed, but some flaws are bigger vulnerabilities and hindrances than others, and some are more critical in some roles than others

reading what weev wrote about hunter wallace and cantwell makes me want to purge both of them. smdh and i don't care if i get called an elitist, we have to have some behavioral standards for the ethnostate

https://scontent.fmkc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30724370_403380310072560_7406213335747657728_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=e43104c59c9b57b0124beddbad5b1389&oe=5B675762

I feel the same thing, but we don't have an ethnostate to purge them from

So what would they be purged from?

relevance

Right, but how?

My personal preference would be that Serious Acusations should be to the point and mostly just expositions of the clear evidence to back them up

Saying someone is an FBI informant is a specific claim and the reasons for the claim can be given

That's different from, for example, the vague accusations I've seen leveled at Spencer, where a photo of him with two asian girls is presented as somehow discrediting him