Message from @Crash
Discord ID: 554456482062794762
GUYS, I am a flat earther and a feminist and an anti vaxxer and a furry! Don't hate me yet? I'm Gay!
CLOAKING ASTRONAUT: https://imgur.com/a/5ydDT5G
oof
TIM PEAKE CGI GLITCH: https://imgur.com/a/llWLg5v
Unmute @yung superman
THUMBS IN VACUUM: https://imgur.com/a/ZuOu958
I need to join an anti vax group
APOLLO FLAG WAVING: https://imgur.com/a/X5tpR1K
Oh yes level 1
GIRDER STEEL REFLECTION: https://imgur.com/a/49bG3Gr
@Human Sheeple on that first pic, you pointed at nothing
**hey I’m a furry, but I believe in the round earth and I’m ace and I do take vaccines cuz I don’t wanna die**
BENDY AIRLOCK DOOR: https://imgur.com/a/iLcVjvq
SATELLITE ON A STRING: https://imgur.com/a/fNCXTE5
they do
can someone link an anti vaxx server
GEMINI PROJECTED EARTH: https://imgur.com/a/w27xcFk
Guys, I was kicked from the server for debating @Human Sheeple.
stfu
@Citizen Z please remove him as md.
just ban me already smh
@Shwubblz ツ It was me 😡
Why?
@Crash cause its the edge my guy
@Crash refraction, optical slant, angular resolution
I was arguing human.
When a ship sails off toward the horizon, it doesn't just get smaller and smaller until it's not visible anymore. Instead, the hull seems to sink below the horizon first, then the mast. When ships return from sea, the sequence is reversed: First the mast, then the hull, seem to rise over the horizon.
The ship-and-horizon observation is so self-evident that 1881's "Zetetic Astronomy," the first modern flat-Earth text, devotes a chapterto "debunking" it. The explanation relies on assuming that the sequential disappearance is simply an illusion brought on by perspective. This debunking does not make much sense, however, as there's nothing about perspective (which just says that things are smaller over longer distances) that should make the bottom of an object disappear before the top. If you'd like to prove to yourself that perspective isn't the reason for boats disappearing hull-first and returning mast-first, bring a telescope or binoculars on your trip to the harbor. Even with vision enhancement, the ship will still dip below the curve of the Earth.
I John Stamos only speak the truth
What are these images?! These arrows point at absolutely nothing @Human Sheeple
facts=mute
Alright, @That Virgo Furry has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
Ahh yes of course
hey Jonathan Stamos #1
@Shwubblz ツ It was my mistake. Sorry. And thanks for your patience
It is I John Stamos
@John Stamos you're unmuted
Angular slant on a flat surface
When a ship sails off toward the horizon, it doesn't just get smaller and smaller until it's not visible anymore. Instead, the hull seems to sink below the horizon first, then the mast. When ships return from sea, the sequence is reversed: First the mast, then the hull, seem to rise over the horizon.
The ship-and-horizon observation is so self-evident that 1881's "Zetetic Astronomy," the first modern flat-Earth text, devotes a chapterto "debunking" it. The explanation relies on assuming that the sequential disappearance is simply an illusion brought on by perspective. This debunking does not make much sense, however, as there's nothing about perspective (which just says that things are smaller over longer distances) that should make the bottom of an object disappear before the top. If you'd like to prove to yourself that perspective isn't the reason for boats disappearing hull-first and returning mast-first, bring a telescope or binoculars on your trip to the harbor. Even with vision enhancement, the ship will still dip below the curve of the Earth.