Message from @luke

Discord ID: 366054763776835584


2017-10-07 02:32:29 UTC  

yes most of darth's arguments are based around the fact that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

2017-10-07 02:33:05 UTC  

one of his last arguments is that science doesn't exist.

2017-10-07 02:33:18 UTC  

(condensed)

2017-10-07 02:33:22 UTC  

A creator exist the problem is the abrahamic god doesn't

2017-10-07 02:33:38 UTC  

yes, thank you, white sharia.

2017-10-07 02:34:25 UTC  

Science agrees with a creator. It doesn't agree with Abraham

2017-10-07 02:34:53 UTC  

I did this shit in high scvhool. you can't prove nor disprove god.

2017-10-07 02:35:05 UTC  

cool

2017-10-07 02:35:07 UTC  

the line of Abraham was rescinded as the lineage of "God's Chosen People" in the New Testament

2017-10-07 02:35:09 UTC  

best philospohical minds have tried

2017-10-07 02:35:14 UTC  

revised by God himself to anyone who accepts him

2017-10-07 02:35:57 UTC  

@Darth Dawkins These limits usually take the form: "Because we observe [X], which occurs at rate [Y], the universe must be at least [Z] years old". There are three standard creationist responses: First, creationists assert that current rates (Y) are different than past rates. It is possible that these rates changed — but under uniformitarianism, which is necessary for science to function, we must assume that rates did not change unless there is evidence for this change. Second, creationists appeal to the Omphalos hypothesis and argue that God deceptively created the world to appear old. This is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, and is unscientific. Third, creationists ignore the evidence and deny that [X] exists altogether or assert that belief in a Young Earth is based on faith, not science. All of these answers are critically flawed.

2017-10-07 02:37:05 UTC  

By studying nature you can get to know the creator. The fact is science doesn't agree with Abraham. Therefore the Bible and its teachings is wrong.

2017-10-07 02:46:41 UTC  

can i get a USA tag?

2017-10-07 02:47:49 UTC  

anyone else think @Sheepsaurus lowkey sounds like Jordan Peterson

2017-10-07 02:48:19 UTC  

has darth dawkins muted him yet?

2017-10-07 02:48:24 UTC  

no

2017-10-07 02:48:43 UTC  

then it's not him/

2017-10-07 02:49:19 UTC  

i dont think he sounds like Jordan. He sounds way younger

2017-10-07 02:50:24 UTC  

Who is Jordan Peterson ?

2017-10-07 02:50:56 UTC  

is anyone called emily here

2017-10-07 02:50:58 UTC  

Also, I am trying to get Dawkins here to understand that just because he asks his questions to the other person, it doesn't mean the other person then automatically have to answer

2017-10-07 02:51:16 UTC  

@Darth Dawkins the winner of a debate doesn't mute the loser.

2017-10-07 02:51:32 UTC  

If the other person doesn't answer the question, he automatically has to answer his own question, to progress

2017-10-07 02:51:37 UTC  

@luke why

2017-10-07 02:51:39 UTC  

But he doesn't want to answer his own question

2017-10-07 02:51:59 UTC  

So there's no progress, just fingerpointing

2017-10-07 02:52:00 UTC  

@Sheepsaurus eh? is this the first time you've ever watched a debate?

2017-10-07 02:52:10 UTC  

@Sheepsaurus famous psychologist

2017-10-07 02:52:22 UTC  

Trying to defend you Taco

2017-10-07 02:52:28 UTC  

I might be doing a shitty job of it though

2017-10-07 02:52:48 UTC  

@Sheepsaurus fair enough, he didn't answer questions I put to him

2017-10-07 02:53:03 UTC  

Read what I wrote, from the other side, Taco

2017-10-07 02:53:16 UTC  

Dawkins is asking questions

2017-10-07 02:53:33 UTC  

@Sheepsaurus I get it, thanks.

2017-10-07 02:54:03 UTC  

So, I support you - I think Dawkins is unreasonably impossible to have a conversation with

2017-10-07 02:54:45 UTC  

he really is. I've beaten him twice

2017-10-07 02:54:53 UTC  

I wouldn't say beaten

2017-10-07 02:54:57 UTC  

he runs and mutes me

2017-10-07 02:55:11 UTC  

won, then