Message from @Zephial
Discord ID: 371107476625555467
cancer, there.
The univese is NOT based on entropy (constant movement to disorder and chaos).......the universe is ENTHALPY...(a movement to balance and order) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy
@GrizzlyGuerilla☉♉♈☽♌♍ universe is exapnding but matter isnt being created
@Queef Madagascar Everything is zero sum.
so eventully it will be equally mixed
no
its not
look up heat death of universe
Universe is NOT expanding. Universe is reabalancing back to order (ENTHALPY)
no
universe is expanding
matter isnt being created
Mainstream science says Universe is a chance creation and moving to chaos and disorder (ENTROPY) -- this is wrong. ENTHALPY is the true metaphysical mode of Nature.
@Machiavelli tell him logic isnt necessarily true
just because we percive the world as adhering to law of non contradictions dosnt make it necessarily true
Feed me some shit
@Machiavelli I dont recomend listening to that postmodernist
This is so frustrating
@Queef Madagascar ```just because we percive the world as adhering to law of non contradictions dosnt make it necessarily true``` It does.
RIP
@Machiavelli its contingently true
your presupposing the christian worldview is true
@Machiavelli check your dm's
tell him you presuppose the worldview is false
the ultimate authority argument is an arbritray bias
Universe is NOT expanding. Universe is reabalancing back to order (ENTHALPY)
Mainstream science says Universe is a chance creation and moving to chaos and disorder (ENTROPY) -- this is wrong. ENTHALPY is the true metaphysical mode of Nature.
If you see Enthalpy in the universe, you have to admit that the universe was made as a purposeful creation with specific mode of operation.
were's your proof
@.PunishedShlomo Open your eyes and look around you.
all i see are galaxies redshifting with andromeda blueshifting
@.PunishedShlomo Makes sure to look with Real Eyes in order to realise.
@somerussianguy .........if you accept Enthalpy that is
zzz
@ωhï†εy(((maverick rhetorician))) needing a verification over not needing one is an arbritray bias
Is this nota question of faith
not*