We should talk about M I L I T A R Y S T R A T E G Y

we should talk about FOOSEBALL

I mean its not Dawkins fault these kids dont know what they are talking about

@ωhï†εy(((maverick rhetorician))) listen to me mate

your gonna get schooled

*you're

Didn' Machiavelli bring up that he hates theocracies, thus Christianity is bad?

how do you the law of non contridictions is *objectively* true

I did want to talk about that

REEEEEEE

Well hating the extreme of something doesn't mean you hate that thing

But Dawkins is talking for a half hour

@Max Payne yea

YOUR GONNA GET SCHOOLED

Theocracies are retarded

Well of course, but we do not live in one

But i guess that's just my worldview

a lot of these are edgy high school atheists with nothing of use to counter his argument

Any time there was one under Christianity was a perversion of the religion

Living in darth Dawkins world

either open your brain and learn something or call in someone who has the brain cells to counter his arguments

Epistemology is a crock of shit

THAT BEING SAID, a religion like Islam is very tricky

I find it funny when they say that believing in God is a positive claim and they dont have to prove anything. When even their science works in the way of if someone makes a claim it is up to other people to prove it wrong

It is a religio-political system

@Machiavelli read out my messages

or a socio-religio-system depending on how you view it

when you go up

@Machiavelli I dont recommend listening to this Queef Postmodernist

how do you know the law of non contradictions is objectively true

inbred

We know his

lmao wait for him to finsih

all two of them

they are focused more on discrediting his position then on systematically analyzing his argument. it wouldnt surprise me if half of these kids wrote down some edgy atheists arguments from a website and keep spouting marxist modernist perspectives

Darth is arguing from a circular position though, but it is one of faith, ultimately.

That's not a post-modernist position, that's just a fact

but his argument stated that athiests hold circular arguments as well

If one cannot argue in the affirmative, they have faith that their position is infalible.

based on laws as authority