?

WTF.

which has NOTHI9NG TO DO WITH RESEARCH

is there ios alreayd data on it then why go through the whole process

You ask a question.

Research.

holy crap

Hypothesis.

dandramere has the vaguest idea of how this works

RESEARCH is NOT a prerequisite for a HYPOTHESIS

tbh dandra sounds like a potato nig

a HYPOTHESIS can be formed LITERALLY IN A VACUUM

yteah that's the chart

whether it is a GOOD or BAD hypothesis IS DETERMINED BY THE DATA

Pressupose causality

what's the issue?

That's the scientific METHOD.

"research" is a vestigial fucking part

but a hypothesis formed in a literal vacuum has no meaning whatsoever

You have data that is present before your experiment

@.PunishedShlomo THAT is corect

Why is this an issue?

if it has no input from relity

You make a hypotesis based on the data you have and what you want to test on

yeah wtff

Blacks did better under the strict thumb of Whites. Why because through external stimuli they were forced to act like us. As soon as that external stimuli was removed they reverted back to nature

is the question that you need to be aware of a subject to question it?

@Tenet

or like have knowledge of it in the first place

how is observation/data/research invalid in a fucking chance universe??? lol its more meaningful in such a scenario if anything

PREQUESENT

not a word

good job

Although I think the above is a good way to show how a lot of science works now.

😂

EM K!!!!