did someone say ROADS?

or if you want a neo-feudalist theocrat

Theocracy is good, but why capitalism 🙁

oh

then youre fine

Feudalism is ok in my books

capitalism is the best

laisser faire capitalism would fuse the class of feudalism minus the priest class

natcap my goys

i would put the church above it to keep moral in check and encourage volutary collectivism

<:ugu:371509111520755712>

the media would be church owned

what if a person is sexulaly a sub?

they would like being abused

outside of that it would be laisser faire

part of moral overwatch is arresting rapist

forced collectivism create moral individualism like the snowflake

If anyone has a question, please ping or dm me or another moderator!

@sithfreeman how do I get a GF?

@JJcarter21R Pay the price

Im poor

im in a unoin I got no money

but do we still need eminent domain to take property?

no

we need a gun

what about to take property to drill for oil?

Just buy the lawn

i actually against public roads

because public roads are the main subidies to immigration and globalisation

yes thanks

public roads are welfare for the wealthy

the landlord

im for neo-feudalism

"because public roads are the main subidies to immigration and globalisation" explain this

without public roads, the immigrants are required to ask the owners of the private roads to move around the country

and not all owners are accepting of immigrants

wtf

the state owns the booze

Private roads are bad

then people can choose who does and doesnt have access

Good point @Kurokami ✝🤴🇧🇪 but there is still a lot of downsides im guessing