Message from @.Sahncede

Discord ID: 372139466497720321


2017-10-23 21:47:55 UTC  

How his claims are true and you have to falsify them or you're wrong and he's right.

2017-10-23 21:48:25 UTC  

he's not into falsification

2017-10-23 21:48:31 UTC  

Exactly.

2017-10-23 21:48:37 UTC  

Which makes his circular logic complate

2017-10-23 21:48:39 UTC  

.complete*

2017-10-23 21:48:41 UTC  

What do you say about the generations of scholars proving God?

2017-10-23 21:48:53 UTC  

You don't have to subscribe to falsification as an ulimate principle.

2017-10-23 21:48:56 UTC  

He then states that you must go by the law of falsification to disprove him.

2017-10-23 21:49:00 UTC  

there are more athiest scholars, and smarter ones at that

2017-10-23 21:49:04 UTC  

And since the law of falisifacation cannot be proven.

2017-10-23 21:49:08 UTC  

You cannot disprove him

2017-10-23 21:49:08 UTC  

No there isn't lol

2017-10-23 21:49:09 UTC  

.Check mate.

2017-10-23 21:49:11 UTC  

It's a new thing

2017-10-23 21:49:13 UTC  

@Marty it's all about disconfirmation

2017-10-23 21:49:13 UTC  

give me examples of christian scholars

2017-10-23 21:49:15 UTC  

Provide us a proof Zeph.

2017-10-23 21:49:17 UTC  

No it's not.

2017-10-23 21:49:21 UTC  

yes

2017-10-23 21:49:22 UTC  

it

2017-10-23 21:49:22 UTC  

is

2017-10-23 21:49:22 UTC  

Nope.

2017-10-23 21:49:26 UTC  

He wraps it up in bullshit word and salad and acts smug.

2017-10-23 21:49:35 UTC  

lol

2017-10-23 21:49:41 UTC  

you think the multiverse hypothesis is falsifiable?

2017-10-23 21:49:55 UTC  

I'm asking you to prove falsification should be used as a metaphysical principle.

2017-10-23 21:50:01 UTC  

Asks bullshit yes or no questions and demands they are answered how he wishes, only allows his opponent to speak 1 word answers then takes back over.

2017-10-23 21:50:05 UTC  

what would I?

2017-10-23 21:50:17 UTC  

How do you not know what I am saying you absolute degenerate. Thousands of years of studying and generations of intellects

2017-10-23 21:50:18 UTC  

So what's the point of you bringing it up?

2017-10-23 21:50:46 UTC  

I think disconfirmability should be used

2017-10-23 21:50:52 UTC  

Zeph reference a lot of stuff. Never seen this retard actually argue.

2017-10-23 21:50:57 UTC  

When?

2017-10-23 21:50:59 UTC  

All the time?

2017-10-23 21:51:00 UTC  

Lol

2017-10-23 21:51:15 UTC  

for causal explanations

2017-10-23 21:51:21 UTC  

Hinduism has 8000 years of shcolars arguing it

2017-10-23 21:51:39 UTC  

What type of causal explainations?

2017-10-23 21:51:39 UTC  

Yes but Hindus haven't falisfied Darth Dawkins position.

2017-10-23 21:51:40 UTC  

so by your logic that makes it more believeable than christianity

2017-10-23 21:51:41 UTC  

there