Message from @dolan
Discord ID: 372963772450603010
and further pages on
okay
Imagine that you create a very large cage and put a group of mice into it. You let the mice live and breed in this cage freely, without disturbance. If you were to come back after five years and look into this cage, you would find mice. Five years of breeding would cause no change in the mice in that cage -- they would not evolve in any noticeable way. You could leave the cage alone for a hundred years and look in again and what you would find in the cage is mice. After several hundred years, you would look into the cage and find not 15 new species, but mice.
The point is that evolution in general is an extremely slow process. When two mice breed, the offspring is a mouse. When that offspring breeds, its offspring is a mouse. When that offspring breeds... And the process continues. Point mutations do not change this fact in any significant way over the short haul.
on page 10
becasue they dont need to evolve if they are properly fed, and their envrionment stayed consistent
DD has to assume the laws of logic *before* he comes to his worldview
Before the law of identity: God = God & Not God
After the law of identity: God = God
'm just going to point something out really quickly @Foxy something that may be useful to acknowledge in this discussion that people almost never remember to acknowledge.
the currently typical stance and assumption taken by evolutionary biologists on evolution (and actually historically the typical stance) is that there were likely multiple independant origin point of biogenesis. not single. multiple seperate ones is the assumed event. the "single common ancestor" criticisms are at least partial red herrings because they don't actually apply to the typical assumed origin event. the actually typical assumption within the field is one of multiple origin points that of course converged but do not all go back to a single ancestor. its not the standard among evolutionary biologists to assume there was one biogenesis and <@320281143763271710>🎃 should probably acknowledge that at least a bit before making some of his statements and make appropriate alterations.
@Manny no that's wrong. you don't have to acknowledge that. he's throwing out another red herring as far as the laws being required for evolution thing.
🚫 **This channel cannot be used for music commands.**
God is contingent on the laws of logic
lol...i didn't use a music command
berkeley talks about how evolution isn't always slow and steady
it can occur in burts
bursts*
and that it is a misconception to say it only occurs slowly and gradually
although its unlikely for a given person to get the winning lottery number someone does.
***someone*** does
you do not understand statistics.
does someone who can use mic happen to understand the math problems with dawkins falacies here?
my mics broke
darth does not understand?
correct
that's a red herring
in physics there is absolutely chance
stop misrepresenting the field 😠
no
say no
get a mic on amazon
lol
ill give you the money
the p11 is a good mic and headset
only about 20 dollars
deny him what he needs for that argument.
the answer is no
used for 22
even if my mic's not broke i wouldn't use one. my voice has gotten me doxed before.
WHAT