DD has to assume the laws of logic *before* he comes to his worldview

Before the law of identity: God = God & Not God
After the law of identity: God = God

'm just going to point something out really quickly @Foxy something that may be useful to acknowledge in this discussion that people almost never remember to acknowledge.

the currently typical stance and assumption taken by evolutionary biologists on evolution (and actually historically the typical stance) is that there were likely multiple independant origin point of biogenesis. not single. multiple seperate ones is the assumed event. the "single common ancestor" criticisms are at least partial red herrings because they don't actually apply to the typical assumed origin event. the actually typical assumption within the field is one of multiple origin points that of course converged but do not all go back to a single ancestor. its not the standard among evolutionary biologists to assume there was one biogenesis and <@320281143763271710>🎃 should probably acknowledge that at least a bit before making some of his statements and make appropriate alterations.

@Manny no that's wrong. you don't have to acknowledge that. he's throwing out another red herring as far as the laws being required for evolution thing.

🚫 **This channel cannot be used for music commands.**

God is contingent on the laws of logic

lol...i didn't use a music command

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a5

berkeley talks about how evolution isn't always slow and steady

it can occur in burts

bursts*

and that it is a misconception to say it only occurs slowly and gradually

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_51

link that talks about pace of evolution

although its unlikely for a given person to get the winning lottery number someone does.

***someone*** does

you do not understand statistics.

does someone who can use mic happen to understand the math problems with dawkins falacies here?

my mics broke

darth does not understand?

correct

that's a red herring

in physics there is absolutely chance

stop misrepresenting the field 😠

no

say no

get a mic on amazon

lol

ill give you the money

the p11 is a good mic and headset

only about 20 dollars

deny him what he needs for that argument.

the answer is no

https://www.amazon.com/Turtle-Beach-Amplified-Headset-Playstation-3/dp/B002I0J5CO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1508992100&sr=8-1&keywords=p11%2Bheadset&th=1

used for 22

even if my mic's not broke i wouldn't use one. my voice has gotten me doxed before.

WHAT

can you pm me the story, i'm curious

my voice is rather unusual

its that simple

oof

but that wouldn't directly lead you to someone

are you famous?

that sounds a little far fetched

you don't need to be famous

not even slightly. if you understand social patterns the world gets a bit smaller. either you understand this or you don't.