👍

@WingALingDragon It's the superior position

lolol

stop, it's a waste of time

@WingALingDragon There are no legitimate arguments against strong agnosticism

LOLOL

"strong agnosticism"

oxymoron

it's the weakest available position

at least stop being a puss and go be athiest

If you're going to fail to justify your own existence, at least be a fucking man about it.

@WingALingDragon Hard Athiests are almost as cucked as religionfags

It's like agnostics can't exist without being retards

"There's no legitimate argument against agnosticism"

Well, it sure is difficult to argue with a non-argument

@WingALingDragon Do you have a legitimate argument against hard agnosticism?

No, because agnosticism is the religious equivalent of a long, lethargic sigh after a day of doing literally nothing

It is

a non

BREAKING TRUMPS TWITTER IS GONE

argument

I'm going to go get food now

@WingALingDragon So your argument boils down to "agnosticism is cucked because it's kind of in the middle I guess"

No, it's not "in the middle"

it's lazy

as intellectually lazy as it gets

"I don't believe or not-believe in a God"

@WingALingDragon A lazy answer isn't always a wrong answer.

so you have no position

"HNNNNG- YOU CAN'T ARGUE WITH NO POSITION"

retard

see you

@WingALingDragon oh, so you dont know what an agnostic is... ok carry on

@WingALingDragon It's more than that though. A hard agnostic will tell you it's impossible to prove the existence of God.

nvm its back up

>wolfenstein