Message from @bam
Discord ID: 370315378984878081
Hmmm
wow thats a long fucking question
Do ur own homeworks bruv
Humanities are such a wank
His fault for being a cuck and even taking welfare
Fuck Howard
Prick
@Cade Im not a fan of welfare but I'll try to answer your questions the best I can. 1. I dont believe basic needs should be dependent on moral behavior. Sometimes we act differently from who we are based on other factors, depression being one of them. In the end we are all judged by God. 2. The answer is different for government services than for church charity as government services act generally and church charity specifically. 3. I am Christian and Conserative and my answer heavily relies on this.
Welfare is only for those who truely need it and not to be taken advantage of
The question "should basic needs be dependant on moral behavior" is not really a very good question, but I suppose the answer is yes. For Howard's situation, a perfect world would have some way of looking into the future and learning that he would have gone in a downward spiral from goodwill of others. Becasue we don't have that ability, our best judgement on who should receive or not receive benefits come from our morals.
This also is why churches giving gifts to the needy is so much better than government giving welfare. The government sees everyone (with no past crime, etc) as someone who could receive welfare, just a number and an expense, while churches and local communities judge the individual and his purpose.
Howard found a really shitty church that should have instantly realized Howard was incapable of believing or enjoying the benefits the church provided.
It is his homework, yes @Jeb
Howard should see a therapist for his hatred of people giving him food
Lol
That being said you are an adult and you shouldn’t abuse drugs while on welfare
This is true^
Lol
What's with this quintupling down on the travel ban?
Hasn't the Supreme Court just said, "It's legal; deal with it?"
@bam That was with one particular version of it. Now there's a new version, so it can get blocked
The Supreme Court didn't even say if it's constitutional or not, they just dropped the case because Trump pushed a new version out, so the current SC case wasn't even needed.
It is surprisingly hard to get that information from any "news" source
Not really
It just takes a few seconds of looking into an article besides reading the headline
Thank you for the clarification. <:FeelsComfyMan:356316472240373760>
t
Tonigjt
again?
does Bernie enjoy being used to wipe the floor?
LMFAOOO
xd
Just found out about this '#MeToo' bullshit
I don't know what's more revolting, that Hollywood are trying to deflect blame from the Weinstein scandal, or that they're trying to take advantage of this and turn it into a social justice movement
Hollywood is a cesspool
They literally can't be allowed to keep getting away with this
God is smiting CA every year
Hes trying
Trump should say something about them
We were so fucking close to cracking that shit wide open at long last, but all that's going to happen is Weinstein does a stint in rehab, and becomes the next Roman Polanski
And Joe public falls for their propaganda every time. "Hollywood culture isn't the problem! All men are just predators!"