Message from @Polygon

Discord ID: 374309713510137856


2017-10-29 19:55:55 UTC  

That's because they blurted a lot like you

2017-10-29 19:55:57 UTC  

It used to be a cable access show

2017-10-29 19:56:18 UTC  

#imnotevenanatheist

2017-10-29 19:56:21 UTC  

What did I blert out

2017-10-29 19:56:25 UTC  

Just saying

2017-10-29 19:57:41 UTC  

Exactly no point to make

2017-10-29 19:57:42 UTC  

<@&350739960602689547> whats the debate for tonight?

2017-10-29 19:58:05 UTC  

Atheism is an irrational world veiw

2017-10-29 19:58:06 UTC  

only atheist i know of, is the amazing atheist

2017-10-29 19:58:07 UTC  

@sithfreeman will be posting it

2017-10-29 19:58:11 UTC  

ok

2017-10-29 19:58:12 UTC  

aka. the banana butt guy

2017-10-29 19:58:43 UTC  

That's gay who even subs that guy

2017-10-29 19:58:45 UTC  

True atheism involves auto-sodomization by banana

2017-10-29 20:00:02 UTC  

Agreed it's a fundamental part of the rational that they use as a base to build logical argument from

2017-10-29 20:01:39 UTC  

Enjoy your atheist circle jerk

2017-10-29 20:02:06 UTC  

Other religions sodomize children and goats instead

2017-10-29 20:02:13 UTC  

it's a lesser evil to only sodomize yourself with a banana

2017-10-29 21:32:07 UTC  

<@&356269253453938690> as a way to get high quality debates and discussions going on we will be pinging this role once a day and doing a "question of the day" type thing where we will debate/discussed topics
right now we will be debating theology with the one and only @Darth Dawkins in voice chat if you are a text user debate about theology in the <#356277119862439937> text channel if you have suggestions for future topics of the day or suggestions in general post them in <#363569734001754113> 🙂 ❤ and if you would like not to be pinged everyday ping a mod and ask to get the serious user role taken away

2017-10-29 21:32:50 UTC  

What kind of theological debating?

2017-10-29 21:33:10 UTC  

k

2017-10-29 21:33:22 UTC  

anything that involves theology

2017-10-29 21:33:24 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2017-10-29 21:33:31 UTC  

is god gay

2017-10-29 21:33:42 UTC  

The cake is a lie

2017-10-29 21:33:57 UTC  

Although it keeps a society together

2017-10-29 21:34:34 UTC  

Oddly enough, I find my Christian buddies to be more open minded than atheists these days

2017-10-29 21:35:13 UTC  

I follow christianity simply because of the morals imposed by it

2017-10-29 21:48:29 UTC  

Who here has seen JBP on the Psychological Significance of the Biblical Stories?

2017-10-29 21:50:50 UTC  

What establishes that god exists? @Darth Dawkins

2017-10-29 21:51:07 UTC  

Beyond your belief, and various books

2017-10-29 21:53:05 UTC  

But it's been written, translated, and rewritten so many times

2017-10-29 21:53:19 UTC  

I see the bible as a compilation of explanations, for parents to tell their kids

2017-10-29 21:53:38 UTC  

Because they are incapable of making up explanations themselves

2017-10-29 22:01:23 UTC  

Studying the beliefs of people from around the world, how they formed their religions and where they came from, you can get a good grasp of there certainly being *something* other than us out there, and the more you look into it the more you start to notice certain... patterns. repeating patterns of civilizations that have had no contact with eachother. That is what pulled me from being atheist back to some sort of believer.

2017-10-29 22:01:53 UTC  

Debate on the bible is a whole different topic, but that's my answer for what establishes god exists

2017-10-29 22:13:01 UTC  

Fair point, I'd like to move over to Darth Dawkins though. I take issue with his perception of the world, and his stubborn interest in not allowing anybody else to refute his belief.

If I could, I'd preface my question with; "Humor me for a second, and assume that there is no god" - Which he will definitely not want to, so I will ask him nicely again, and insist, "Hypothetically, can we humor the idea that there may not be a god". And he if agrees, I'd ask the question: "If someone were to provide you exact evidence that god does in fact not exist, would you then believe the evidence, and further showcase the evidence for others, or will you completely refute it, because you believe the bible itself is evidence enough against it?"

2017-10-29 22:14:54 UTC  

Similarly, I'd like to ask him: "How come we have hundreds of fields of study, that completely dispute the idea that the earth is a most, around 6000 years old, and all you have is your book, yet you still can't humor the idea that you might be wrong about that theory?"

2017-10-29 22:15:46 UTC  

I also take issue with his extremely poor debate etiquette

2017-10-29 22:34:09 UTC  

My point of view about the argument of providing causality is this:

2017-10-29 22:34:48 UTC  

Isn't it a bit convenient that the number 1 argument for causality has been pushed into every nook and cranny of the world, making it very near impossible to actually implement any other theory?