Message from Clonemaster™ 6.41 in The Right Server #chat


2017-09-28 08:05:40 UTC  

@fr got you mixed up with someone, then

2017-09-28 08:05:43 UTC  

np

2017-09-28 08:05:43 UTC  

I challenge anyone in this chat to indisputably prove to me that sawblades cause cancer.

2017-09-28 08:05:44 UTC  

sorry m8

2017-09-28 08:05:50 UTC  

its k

2017-09-28 08:05:57 UTC  

@Extra Crispy whatever happened to plain old American sugar. smh

2017-09-28 08:06:00 UTC  

@Fusion lol, i agree it is silly

2017-09-28 08:06:06 UTC  

@futurestorms It ended up in Mexico

2017-09-28 08:06:10 UTC  

in Mexican Coke.

2017-09-28 08:06:15 UTC  

Mmm...

2017-09-28 08:06:32 UTC  

cornsyrup was subsidized, and eventually a number of research projects made it cheaper to produce and purchase than sugar

2017-09-28 08:06:39 UTC  

@Composers Please can I get Textipede and Serious User 🤠

2017-09-28 08:06:40 UTC  

@Fusion mexican coke is delicious. Soda in large quantities is bad.

2017-09-28 08:07:01 UTC  

Honestly, real sugar sodas do taste a lot better than sodas with corn syrup.

2017-09-28 08:07:16 UTC  

I can't distinguish specifically what it is about the taste, but it's just better.

2017-09-28 08:07:28 UTC  

@Extra Crispy Corn by products are in a lot of stuff. We grow so much of it.

2017-09-28 08:07:40 UTC  

the only reasons as to why the corporations have more say in gov't than us is because the corporate tax holds less of an influence on corporations than the income tax does on citizens, resulting in more money being available for corporations than citizens

2017-09-28 08:07:52 UTC  

It's like how diet sodas suck - you can't put your finger on why they taste so bad, but they just do

2017-09-28 08:07:59 UTC  

@Fusion I'll take a small batch cream soda with cane sugar any day.

2017-09-28 08:08:00 UTC  

@futurestorms imagine if corporations could put addictive chemicals that would make you want to purchase said soda and consume it in a very alarming rate, regardless of health concerns to you, you think they would not if they could? there motive after all is profit

2017-09-28 08:08:11 UTC  

@Blood well the the government handles the perogatives that the constitution delegates to the government, so it's only the government's responsibility to protect the rights of coporations just as any citizen's rights are protected. It's not the government's job to regulate them

2017-09-28 08:08:14 UTC  

the chemicals in diet sodas are known to directly cause cancer

2017-09-28 08:08:22 UTC  

>addictive chemicals

2017-09-28 08:08:33 UTC  

yes

2017-09-28 08:08:35 UTC  

They already have that

2017-09-28 08:08:44 UTC  

it's called cigarettes.

2017-09-28 08:08:50 UTC  

@Blood Good. Wish i thought of it. No one is holding a gun to my head saying 'drink it, NOW'

2017-09-28 08:08:59 UTC  

Personally think cigarettes have no purpose.

2017-09-28 08:09:03 UTC  

@Clonemaster™ 6.41 first of no, the constitution does not mention protecting corporations, also what kind of biases shit is, "protecting them " but not "regullationg them"

2017-09-28 08:09:04 UTC  

the gov't subsidized research programs that would make addictive fattening chemicals easier to produce and cheaper to purchase than regular sugar

2017-09-28 08:09:13 UTC  

The tobacco in them could be used for poultices instead of smoking.

2017-09-28 08:09:23 UTC  

Yeah, aspartame etc are disgusting.

2017-09-28 08:09:29 UTC  

Taste wise.

2017-09-28 08:09:36 UTC  

its literal cancer

2017-09-28 08:10:19 UTC  

Give ol' future that sweet siren song known as sucrose.

2017-09-28 08:10:20 UTC  

@futurestorms you think people that smoke cigs dont want to stop? do they say "hey its not like someone is holding agun to my head"

2017-09-28 08:10:53 UTC  

corn syrup is cheaper to purchase than sugar

2017-09-28 08:10:53 UTC  

there are chemicals in the cigs that make it extemely hard to quit

2017-09-28 08:10:55 UTC  

@Blood Don't care. You make the choice. They supply it. Supply and demand.

2017-09-28 08:10:56 UTC  

if we were to raise the corporate tax and lowered income tax, it would allow for citizens to as a whole earn more money than corporations do

2017-09-28 08:11:11 UTC  

@Blood the government simply has no role in anything to which it's not afforded by the constitution. That's the way the government is structured.