Message from Fusion in The Right Server #chat

2017-09-28 08:32:46 UTC  

And is, in my opinion, a stable moderator.

2017-09-28 08:32:51 UTC  

Unlike some others.

2017-09-28 08:32:51 UTC  

Thanks @Extra Crispy for explaining all of this in more depth

2017-09-28 08:32:52 UTC  

if it is decentralized then there will be no logistics system

2017-09-28 08:32:56 UTC  

no prob

2017-09-28 08:33:07 UTC  

if it is centralized then it would have a logistics system

2017-09-28 08:33:09 UTC

2017-09-28 08:33:25 UTC  

logistics as in to distribute the goods?

2017-09-28 08:33:30 UTC  

godammit i should be asleep.

2017-09-28 08:33:30 UTC  

if it had none, then the people would be left to handle their resources themselves, and as such it would not be a certainty that they'd even leave their hands

2017-09-28 08:33:34 UTC  

Where did you find that picture of Quatro's mother, @futurestorms?

2017-09-28 08:33:38 UTC  

do you know what logistics means?

2017-09-28 08:34:02 UTC  

@Fusion She gave me it last night.

2017-09-28 08:34:10 UTC  

it is effectively the transport of materials, be it goods or otherwise

2017-09-28 08:34:27 UTC  


2017-09-28 08:34:31 UTC  

if there is no planned transportation of goods or otherwise, then one half of the nation could be filthy rich with food and the other side starving

2017-09-28 08:34:36 UTC  

they would transport as needed

2017-09-28 08:34:41 UTC  

and there'd be no way to transport that food

2017-09-28 08:34:50 UTC  

says you

2017-09-28 08:35:00 UTC  

ok, so how do you plan on transporting goods without a central planning authority?

2017-09-28 08:35:13 UTC  

@futurestorms You need to get yourself checked.

2017-09-28 08:35:16 UTC  

lol there is already examples of it being done, ratehr than just yourr wishful thinking

2017-09-28 08:35:17 UTC  

carry shit across a field with wagons?

2017-09-28 08:35:22 UTC  

You may be turning blue yourself.

2017-09-28 08:35:29 UTC  

railways would be impossible to run without planning or organization

2017-09-28 08:35:30 UTC  

lol no a dem gov, handlling it'

2017-09-28 08:35:36 UTC  


2017-09-28 08:35:42 UTC  

there is already examples of it

2017-09-28 08:35:42 UTC  

the 'dem gov' will not wish shit into place

2017-09-28 08:36:00 UTC  

human hands would need to operate a system to which they would work at transporting goods

2017-09-28 08:36:06 UTC  

This always comes down to the socialists seeing that the government is the better means or way for them to have thse goods distributed, and that's why it's always turned out that way

2017-09-28 08:36:13 UTC  

at the whims of the 'dem gub' telling them or not

2017-09-28 08:36:42 UTC  

@Extra Crispy right and so human hands would operate

2017-09-28 08:36:49 UTC  

@Fusion before i get myself wrecked.

2017-09-28 08:37:08 UTC  

Because it's quite obvious that there's no guarantee the workers are going to be efficient, able and 'equal' in undertaking it.

2017-09-28 08:37:08 UTC  

yes, but what would stop them from forming an autocracy and organizing as a group to just control who gets what for whatever reason?

2017-09-28 08:37:19 UTC  

the dem gov

2017-09-28 08:37:25 UTC  

they have no power over them though

2017-09-28 08:37:38 UTC  

the logistics are literally handling the clossest thing to money

2017-09-28 08:37:42 UTC  

um, you do realize there is still a military in these nations right

2017-09-28 08:37:46 UTC  

what, is a military going to stop them?