Message from @Blood
Discord ID: 362879758918352898
it is literally dependent on a system that is inherently unstable or centralized
He's also good at accurately utilizing the necessary talking points and information in discussions with leftists.
@Extra Crispy decentralized actually
no
And is, in my opinion, a stable moderator.
Unlike some others.
Thanks @Extra Crispy for explaining all of this in more depth
if it is decentralized then there will be no logistics system
no prob
if it is centralized then it would have a logistics system
logistics as in to distribute the goods?
godammit i should be asleep.
if it had none, then the people would be left to handle their resources themselves, and as such it would not be a certainty that they'd even leave their hands
Where did you find that picture of Quatro's mother, @futurestorms?
do you know what logistics means?
@Fusion She gave me it last night.
it is effectively the transport of materials, be it goods or otherwise
yea
if there is no planned transportation of goods or otherwise, then one half of the nation could be filthy rich with food and the other side starving
and there'd be no way to transport that food
says you
ok, so how do you plan on transporting goods without a central planning authority?
@futurestorms You need to get yourself checked.
lol there is already examples of it being done, ratehr than just yourr wishful thinking
carry shit across a field with wagons?
You may be turning blue yourself.
railways would be impossible to run without planning or organization
lol no a dem gov, handlling it'
LOL
there is already examples of it
the 'dem gov' will not wish shit into place
human hands would need to operate a system to which they would work at transporting goods
This always comes down to the socialists seeing that the government is the better means or way for them to have thse goods distributed, and that's why it's always turned out that way
at the whims of the 'dem gub' telling them or not
@Extra Crispy right and so human hands would operate
@Fusion before i get myself wrecked.
Because it's quite obvious that there's no guarantee the workers are going to be efficient, able and 'equal' in undertaking it.
yes, but what would stop them from forming an autocracy and organizing as a group to just control who gets what for whatever reason?
the dem gov