Message from @羅大哥toni

Discord ID: 375137380002430976


2017-11-01 04:20:25 UTC  

Ellinor is actually destroying you brainlets

2017-11-01 04:20:28 UTC  

ur more like a narcistic faggot

2017-11-01 04:20:30 UTC  

A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.

Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?

Two things result from this fact:

I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power.

II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism with a manifesto of the party itself.

To this end, Communists of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages.

2017-11-01 04:20:36 UTC  

If you are high IQ, I believe you should not be here to chat

2017-11-01 04:20:49 UTC  

Your gay

2017-11-01 04:20:55 UTC  

@Cummies4Commies You already posted this croak of bullshit

2017-11-01 04:20:56 UTC  

no im calling u a faggot cuz ur a faggot

2017-11-01 04:20:56 UTC  

The history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of class struggles.

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master(3) and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.

In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.

The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.

Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other — Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

2017-11-01 04:21:03 UTC  

You were insulting as well <@349745963491131445>

2017-11-01 04:21:15 UTC  

lol

2017-11-01 04:21:24 UTC  

He's in here actually

2017-11-01 04:21:24 UTC  

I don’t care

2017-11-01 04:21:26 UTC  

I've never meet a conservative LGBTQ member in my life

2017-11-01 04:21:28 UTC  

From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered burghers of the earliest towns. From these burgesses the first elements of the bourgeoisie were developed.

The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and Chinese markets, the colonisation of America, trade with the colonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities generally, gave to commerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse never before known, and thereby, to the revolutionary element in the tottering feudal society, a rapid development.

The feudal system of industry, in which industrial production was monopolised by closed guilds, now no longer sufficed for the growing wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system took its place. The guild-masters were pushed on one side by the manufacturing middle class; division of labour between the different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of labour in each single workshop.

Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever rising. Even manufacturer no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and machinery revolutionised industrial production. The place of manufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry; the place of the industrial middle class by industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies, the modern bourgeois.

2017-11-01 04:21:34 UTC  

<@349745963491131445> you honestly fit the stereotype

2017-11-01 04:21:44 UTC  

What?

2017-11-01 04:21:49 UTC  

@Riku the potato I know a gay guy who is a conservative lmao

2017-11-01 04:21:49 UTC  

Alright

2017-11-01 04:21:55 UTC  

Modern industry has established the world market, for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its turn, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange.

Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class. An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and self-governing association in the medieval commune(4): here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany); there taxable “third estate” of the monarchy (as in France); afterwards, in the period of manufacturing proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in fact, cornerstone of the great monarchies in general, the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative State, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.

2017-11-01 04:21:57 UTC  

He BTFO's everyone 😂

2017-11-01 04:22:01 UTC  

Do you know quantum satellites?

2017-11-01 04:22:11 UTC  

i also know gay gys who r conservative

2017-11-01 04:22:13 UTC  
2017-11-01 04:22:15 UTC  

Your know saying conservatives are afraid?

2017-11-01 04:22:19 UTC  

<@&350743715033120769> some cunt is spamming

2017-11-01 04:22:21 UTC  

The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part.

The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom — Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.

The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers.

The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.

The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the brutal display of vigour in the Middle Ages, which reactionaries so much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful indolence. It has been the first to show what man’s activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted expeditions that put in the shade all former Exoduses of nations and crusades.

2017-11-01 04:22:23 UTC  

its the same idea

2017-11-01 04:22:32 UTC  

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> Added Cuckold to Cummies4Commies#1057

2017-11-01 04:22:36 UTC  

you dont put groups into political groups

2017-11-01 04:22:39 UTC  

because ppl dont

2017-11-01 04:22:45 UTC  

<@349745963491131445> what is your Meyers brigs personality type?

2017-11-01 04:22:49 UTC  

doesnt matter if ur gay black or whatver

2017-11-01 04:22:54 UTC  

u just vote what u vote

2017-11-01 04:23:02 UTC  

Fuck outta here cummies with your bullshit

2017-11-01 04:23:08 UTC  

This is the pure definition of a narcissist <@349745963491131445>

2017-11-01 04:23:10 UTC  

thats true individualism

2017-11-01 04:23:12 UTC  

I don’t want to see it

2017-11-01 04:23:14 UTC  

and also

2017-11-01 04:23:17 UTC  

true right wing

2017-11-01 04:23:21 UTC  

Fuck off dickhead

2017-11-01 04:23:35 UTC  

That's funny