Also the 600 series GTX graphics cards had predominantly 720p users, I'm talking about arguments based on numbers and speculation, not assumptions and dreams.

https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1939?vs=2075

which magical system are you using

1080ti cant even run witcher 3 at 1080p with hairworks enabled above 100hz

2k is a nice meme for ppl who have never had high res monitors

1080p has half the latency and can run a *consistent* 144hz

There is no latency difference with 2K, latency (such as GTG) are based on the display type, such as IPS, VA or TN

This proves you don't know what you're talking about

there is def a latency

look up tests

the bigger the screen + res the more latency

And my Gsync 165Hz monitor has the same latency for frametimes as a 165Hz Gsync 1080p monitor at the same framerate.

youre going by the latency on the box

not actual latency tests

Latency on the box? Is that a joke?

the box numbers are meaningless

I know that

GTG latency is almost completely irrelevant if under 5ms.

I'll bite, gonna find a video or two with same species different res monitors

i mean this is completely irrelevant to the discussion

But from experience, there is such a low latency with my monitor, sub 50ms

even if the latency is identical it still takes far more power to run 1440p

That doesn't matter lol

and a 1080ti can barely run games in 1080p

<:PepeChill:378748692741750794>

Uhh

Bait

Good job

https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1939?vs=2075

the benchmarks dont lie <:GWjiangoPepeFedora:389447036329656323>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGyIhiM2Cfg

Those benchmarks are great

The 99th percentile is always over 60fps

And the average is way better

<:GWnanaFeelsDumbMan:392308462165426176>

Even for 1440p

The drop from 1080 to 1440 is so minimal

so you think its acceptable to run games at 100 fps

I think it's acceptable to run games as low as 60fps, but you pretty much require more than 75FPS (with Gsync) for any higher movement action/competitive games

lol ok 👌🏿