That is like saying: can I use the firat amendment to be a jerk at a starbucks vs can I be perceived as a jerk in public?

The social media giants are essentially publiv territory with how they present themsevles and also becaude they essentially have a monopoly on social media.

I like to think of places like fb and twitter to be part of the public space. And I dont think they should make restrictions on free speech.

but when you force private platforms to accommodate people that they don’t want to accommodate, you’re restricting their freedom of speech. there’s a boundary here that is eluding you. like, why shouldn’t the chat room be able to ban problem users? should the government have intervened and forced the new yorker to host bannon after it decided to drop him?

I think it's time to stop clinging to such ridiculous groupings. Private, public. It's irrelevant in present day society in the tech industry.

did you see the Speer and Kershaw extracts

@Fred the Fish just declare major social media outlets public utilities

nationalize them

bing bang boom, problem solved

unless you're some kind of libertarian faggot

either that or public option

so like what china and russia do

it would be better for the government to provide a public social media platform than nationalizing all the competition

@Fred the Fish china and russia don't go far enough

I like what russia does with journalists but they could be doing more

would Nike prevail at the end? what do you guys think about?

Yes they will

this isn't going to end their business if that's what you mean

Most people who buy Nike's are black, and the people who are buying and burning the shoes... Are actually giving money to Nike

Most people in the "shoe game" are minorities

@agag not suggesting that

I'm sure the stock will bounce back and I don't think their sales will be negatively effected

more like wondering if they will feel compelled to end that contract with him (bc the backlash as pepsi did with some kardashian ad) or they will get away with it.

nike's reaction to people burning nike merchandise they already bought

I think it is stupid to burn already-owned merchandise. It makes more sense to just let it naturally wear and no longer purchase from them.

@Noxar did you read the speer extracts

Yo, did I miss this happening? https://archive.fo/AfVxc

@agag I did read your extracts. They just seemed to identify '39 as the year support started waning which I wouldnt have drawn contention with. It was 36 that I did. I even stated as the war started gearing up it started plummeting

Interesting little blurb regardless

my bad

@agag hey man, what is your best argument against the argument from evil?

There is no Evil, change my mind.

There is

It's called Judaism

And the things it has created, such as cultural-marxism etc.

@Kwasy cultural marxism doesnt exist and judaism didnt create it

typical neetsoc

what is judaism? I only know of 8 billion beautiful people, whether they are transgender, bisexual, queer, helicoptersexual, etc.

DER JOOOZ

nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/cop-tasers-black-girl.html

Sergeant Dan Hils’ response to one of his officers tasing an 11-year-old girl in the back for stealing food from a supermarket:

“There seems to be a lack of shock that a juvenile suspect of this age has no respect for people’s property rights.”

I’m just baffled. No words to describe how I feel that won’t put me on some list

@Fred the Fish Are you for or against what he did?