causing frustration

Would it be bad if the beginning of puberty in a developing male DIDN'T involve being confused shitless?

I think he said that it causes you to be confused shitless

Because you have yet to adapt to it

Like the first time you start getting erections

Mhm, so does that mean, according to Freud, not experiencing angst in your early teen years means you failed to go through puberty? Is it problematic if somebody *didn't* experience disturbance upon achieving their first erection?

Probably how he would interpret that

That was his style

To say because of x stage

He is called the father of psychology because of his observations with patients and relating it to a specific cause which modern psychologists do today but with a better understanding

I already knew that. The reason I started this discussion was because I was suspecting Freud was a diddler. (or at least a closeted diddler)

In other words his views are a stepping stone

Well being a surgeon doesn't mean you like cutting people up lol

he did out of research not pleasure is what I am saying

That makes sense, yet I still can't wrap my head around why he couldn't come up with ANY names for the early-life urges of consumption, expulsion & excitement that didn't involve cocks at all.

Well there were biblical words for that

But that was not the point of his studies

Are we having a debate about if freud was a pedophile?

Yes, yes we are.

lol

Geez that's a question

Probs but he did found modern psychology

Then the neofreudians came around

Which shifted to behavioral theory I think?

Probably.

oh yea conditioning

Classical and operant conditioning were behaviorism

Which was tested with animals

I thought it was Skinner who started behaviorism wasn't it?

Was he a neofreudian?

Turns out he wasn't one

He came up with the conditioning theory

Watson came up with behaviorism

Sorry to shift topics quickly, however, the previous points lead me to yet another disturbing corner of psuedoscience-in-the-name-of-promoting-degeneracy:

John Money. The bizarre man that castrated a kid and made him get fucked by his sibling (while both kids were toddlers) just to prove gender wasn't aligned with sex.

How the fuck did he manage to go from predator-with-a-god-complex to being rated highly credible by most of Academia?

Was that before ethics were a thing

Sounds awfully extreme

Born in 1921

Tranny book published in 1969

Gender was a made up term in the 50s I think

the David Reimer stuff is still very controversial