Message from Somedudewithaname in The Right Server #serious
imo there's nothing unethical about a nation historically built around native ethnic groups preserving that status
or unbeneficial considering that the political institutions of those countries are built around that system
Eh I guess you could make an argument it's morally neutral depending on the reasons for it
@Mord This guy wants to know what is beneficial about an ethnostate and why there should be one
Jesus christ this guy scares me already lol
He is probably asleep
Like I should be
Lets argue why god is trash
why do you think God is trash
God isnt "trash" there is nothing to argue
You being edgy and faggoty is an argument
Lol okay we should set some actual debate topics
DO you think states should be organized around religion?
Do you think god is the locus of all morality?
DO you think religion is a net benefit to society?
I was just being edgy lol but nah I want to actually debate
The last 2 questions are pretty obvious
Oh shit here we go
MOrb why is an ethno shit benefical to society?
Why do you want one?
How does it even benefit you?
You identify as a theocrat ezra
You mean why do we need ethnic nationalism?
your in no position to judge anyones opinion.
Sure lets go with that/
mord is white and autistic
i am italian and autistic
im not judging anybody
I am epic and autistic
I'm to leftist to do this shit lol
Ethnic nationalism serves as a framework for being able to have a common culture, background, and in some cases experiences. lt connects those people in a nation. People tend to naturally be collective, and ethnic nationalism grows on that.
Okay but what makes you think a common idenity needs to rest on the basis of race?
WHy couldn't some other idenity serve the same function?
Civic nationalism does not work because you will inevitably have identity politics where people will vote for policies that benefit them.
And why do we even need to value collectives?
Isn't the nature of polotics to vote in self intrest?