l did not say Rome wasn't civnat

you said they did not permit filthy Africans to roam the streets

was that not about Rome

Rome is literally the argument against ethnostates

Also I believe he was referring to Mussolini’s Italy when he said that @agag

It’s still flawed though

l said that Mussolini sought to revive the days of the Roman empire, and to do that, a militaristic dictatorship had to be formed

No you did not

You didn't make that clear but fair enough

I don't know enough of Mussolini's italy to comment

???

when did you say anything about militaristic dictatorship

Jesus christ

Where in that did l say Rome was civnat @Outboarduniform

...

You just said "l did not say Rome wasn't civnat"

But what's your point?

the word civnat doesn't even appear in that @Outboarduniform

No USA was pointing out your flaws in thinking where you said that Rome wasn’t civnat

Not even my argument

It doesn't even matter

It just wasn't an ethnostate

or even close to one.

@Mord you said "lt was not, they did not permit filthy Africans to roam the streets and rape people" after Outboard said "Rome was literally civnat as well"

I figured you were responding to him

@EzraOldenstein 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore the universe has a cause.
4. There cannot be an infinite regress of causes.
5. There cannot be a circular causation.
6. Therefore the universe was caused (either directly or indirectly) by an uncaused cause (i.e that had no beginning).
7. The uncaused cause must transcend space and time, and be sentient.
8. But to say a sentient being that transcends space and time brought the universe into existence, is to say that God exists.
9. Therefore God exists. @Somedudewithaname

lets do this in here so I can actually think and not be swarmed.

Why can't the universe have an infinte regress?

Also your advocating for a belief that breaks your own principle

if god is beyond the scope of causality, the law of causality does not always apply, so why would it apply to this universe?

Because the universe has a cause, the universe has a beginning

Also infinite regress models are floated around in physics

There isnt anything contradictory, you literally cannot read

its the expansion contraction model

No...

Also you haven't shown infinite regress to be true.

"law of causality does not always apply"

It does not apply to god

otherwise he needs a creator

and it dosn't apply to him