Europe as an idea wasn't even fully formed back then

not nearly as much as today but they existed

“Something happens but you won’t know it happens what do”

nah it was pretty fully formed

@agag he referred to the rape gangs

Type of thinking

plutarch identifed more with north africans than he did with the savage barbarians up north

@Mord and your answer was that "they weren't in Europe"

they certainly had the capacity to exist since there were Africans in Europe at the time

Well it was formed to a degree but they didn't unify as much as we like to cliam now

Mostly from WW1

French Foreign Legion

Again. a major church figure during the roman empire was half sub saharan african...

@agag how many Africans were there in Europe in the early 20th century. Less than 1%?

Isn't it still that low?

sure it wasn't nearly as high today

No @Somedudewithaname

lol yeah it's 1%

i just googled it

but you were saying the Roman Empire wasn't even civnat

rome is pretty much the definition of civnat

look at how far reaching their ability to assimilate was

l did not say Rome wasn't civnat

you said they did not permit filthy Africans to roam the streets

was that not about Rome

Rome is literally the argument against ethnostates

Also I believe he was referring to Mussolini’s Italy when he said that @agag

It’s still flawed though

l said that Mussolini sought to revive the days of the Roman empire, and to do that, a militaristic dictatorship had to be formed

No you did not

You didn't make that clear but fair enough

I don't know enough of Mussolini's italy to comment

???

when did you say anything about militaristic dictatorship

Jesus christ

Where in that did l say Rome was civnat @Outboarduniform

...

You just said "l did not say Rome wasn't civnat"

But what's your point?

the word civnat doesn't even appear in that @Outboarduniform