Message from @GE

Discord ID: 493977538952167434


2018-09-25 00:50:31 UTC  

my bad

2018-09-25 00:53:44 UTC  

related

2018-09-25 00:54:12 UTC  

nobody tell him the reason that "africans" are so "diverse"

2018-09-25 00:54:22 UTC  

2012 <:Thonk:362811285869559808>

2018-09-25 00:54:47 UTC  

nobody tell him that it's because north africans (ie: not black) have an entirely different genetic heritage, and are mostly arab or caucasoid

2018-09-25 00:55:53 UTC  

obviously there is a wide gap between them and sub saharan jungle apes, as evidenced by the fact that they can actually form civilization

2018-09-25 00:57:17 UTC  

I sometimes wonder if sub saharan africans would even exist today had they not been colonized, or whether the dozens of diseases we've helped them survive would have wiped them out

2018-09-25 00:59:14 UTC  

>Evolution in that form

2018-09-25 01:01:14 UTC  

@Fred the Fish thank you for being such an uneducated piece of low hanging fruit, it really helps us dish out the redpills

2018-09-25 02:00:04 UTC  

el graeco has nothing to do with recent out of Africa

2018-09-25 02:00:22 UTC  

and nobody believes the solutrean shit

2018-09-25 02:05:31 UTC  

consensus is not an argument

2018-09-25 02:06:11 UTC  

most facts were contrary to consensus at some point

2018-09-25 02:20:50 UTC  

it's a very implausible theory

2018-09-25 02:21:30 UTC  

stone-age people crossing a 3000 mile ice bridge to go somewhere they wouldn't have even known existed

2018-09-25 02:22:36 UTC  

also Clovis people dna shows they're related to both contemporary paleolithic Siberian peoples and modern Native Americans

2018-09-25 02:48:57 UTC  

so there was an interesting argument i read in a book a while ago

2018-09-25 02:50:09 UTC  

if someone is having a crisis of faith, but have yet to depart their faith, wouldn't it be smarter it kill them then, before they depart?

2018-09-25 02:50:16 UTC  

they would then have eternal salvation in heaven

2018-09-25 02:50:22 UTC  

as opposed to eternal suffering in hell

2018-09-25 02:57:27 UTC  

lmfao

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/486385308951379968/493979318226124821/unknown.png

2018-09-25 02:57:35 UTC  

#1 btw

2018-09-25 03:11:21 UTC  

weird only for a split moment it was for me

2018-09-25 03:19:35 UTC  

@agag are you still a locke-ite?

2018-09-25 03:20:58 UTC  

yeah

2018-09-25 03:21:20 UTC  

this country is based more or less completely on his ideas, it's hard to like the American system and not be a Lockeite

2018-09-25 03:22:14 UTC  

do you believe he was right about tabula rasa?

2018-09-25 03:28:03 UTC  

I don't think we're a completely blank slate but I think it's mostly true

2018-09-25 03:28:23 UTC  

there's inborn knowledge but a lot of what we consider innately human traits are learned and won't exist without education

2018-09-25 03:28:27 UTC  

like language

2018-09-25 15:00:06 UTC  

Lets go back some time, has everyone here heard of the Giant-impact hypothesis[1], if so you know thats its the most likely cause of the formation of the moon and two of my favorite supporting facts are 1 moon samples indicate that the Moon's surface was once molten and 2 the stable-isotope ratios of lunar and terrestrial rock are identical, implying a common origin, so along with some other things its relatively plausible and widely excepted. Now I want you to imagine for a second what it would be like to be alive when this took place, what you write down. What im saying is there is a common thread through out the historical texts that have been separated geographically all over the world and they all say the same things about some great catastrophic events, im saying events because of occurrences like meltwater pulse 1B[2] and such, now before I move on I would propose that this be circumstantial evidence for other wild and extravagant claims put forth in these same texts, in other words if they got these these things right why would they be wrong in the very same texts about all the rest of the claims, couple that with all the archaeological evidence as well but we will discus that at a later time.

2018-09-25 15:00:24 UTC  

Moving on, with the fact of a planetary collision there remains a question, what on earth is there bacteria and spores doing thousands of miles above our own atmosphere[3][4]. Add that to the fact of water on the moon[5] and the recent discovery of a possible body of liquid on mars[6]. What if we got samples from all three sources and compared them and they were found to be identical, now that would be something! What would it mean for the outlandish claims of the ancients or other civilizations and such things?

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meltwater_pulse_1B
[3]https://www.livescience.com/26645-microbes-in-the-sky.html
[4]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC546658/pdf/applmicro00228-0103.pdf
[5]https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1006249/NASA-news-Moon-water-confirmed-surface-ice-caps
[6]https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/07/news-lake-found-mars-water-polar-cap-life-space/

2018-09-25 15:01:35 UTC  

This is a quote from a book:

2018-09-25 15:02:15 UTC  

"The bacteria could easily have originated on Earth, rising into the high atmosphere after any one
of the major cataclysms that have occurred here. But more likely and probably the reason why
things have be kept “under wraps” is that the bacteria originated on another planet, the
planet that was destroyed by atomic weaponry and whose remains now make up the so-called
asteroid belt and whose debris has continually fallen into earth atmosphere and onto the very surface,
as Charles Fort and others have researched for decades"

2018-09-25 15:17:58 UTC  

One more piece of evidence for the books proposal is the fact of the asteroid bet being mostly water[7] which means it has to have come from somewhere, and in this case it would be said that it came from another planet with a massive amount of water and possibly life etc.

2018-09-25 15:28:47 UTC  

As im reading the chat history something else is brought to my attention this article https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/ that NormieCamo#7997 posted, its message is clear that white people did not originate in africa, im glad this was brought up because continuing with the theory I was mentioning it further shows the things proposed and that is, that humans and whites specifically may have been genetically altered. Along with this article two concepts come to mind the fact that blood lines are so highly guarded by royals and other elite members of society and the fact that humans have been around for, and this is up for debate, maybe 50,000 or some odd years. The exact number does not matter, but what does matter is scale. If humans have spent 90% of our time being primates and only 10% of the time we have developed langues, amassed great networks of roads, went to space, built computers and any other conquest you can think of, wouldn't it stand to reason that there was genetic manipulations along the way. This would explain why there is no missing link. This may explain the non-coding DNA we all have.

2018-09-25 16:54:38 UTC  

@Blade The discoverer of dna seemed to think Europeans had a different dna from other humans.

2018-09-25 16:54:45 UTC  

And actually suspected our dna contained ET dna.

2018-09-25 16:55:43 UTC  

James Watson, and later Crick held this view.