this is when he would have received the 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 creed

**1 Corinthians 15:3-5 - New King James Version (NKJV)**

```Dust


<3> For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, <4> and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, <5> and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. ```

the keyword here is "received." Paul was taught this creed, he did not create it himself.

@agag so you're holobunga.exe'ing again, I see

this has nothing to do with the Holocaust, this is about the reliability of the Gospels

Jerusalem is land stolen from Palestine, which was stolen with various reasons; one of them being the holobunga

I only saw Jerusalem

too busy

I love this

I do too

>normal conversation about theology

>**CLEARS THROAT**

>”DA JOOS”

Followed by a typical

I-I wasn’t following the discussion !

I was merely pretending to be retarded !

@Outboarduniform Imagine my shock, someone who loves criminals like the fbi and cia who supports and defends jewry.

@agag
The problem is that "received" could be referring to revelation. There is also some clear tension between the "judaizers" and Paul, like the debate over circumcision. That clear gospel story doesnt exist in the didache nor in james. I dont think you have this coherent religion in early christianity.

Can we go for Meritocracy instead of Democracy?

Or Meritocratic democracy?

@agag 1389 responded

@John 313 The Greek language used in this passage is used in other philosophical traditions to denote important traditions passed from teacher to student. Paul never says he received this creed from Jesus, sayind that it's referring to revelation is speculative. Don't you think that's something he'd want to note? Receiving the creed from Peter or another member of the Jerusalem Church lines up perfectly with Paul's description of his life. We know that St. Paul visited St. Peter and stayed with him for 15 days. What do you think they were talking about?
Didache confirms an early Christian belief in the Eucharist and in eternal life through Jesus Christ. How does the Gospel story not exist in it? And James barely even mentions Jesus, though when it does he calls him the Christ. James was writing to people who were already Christian, there's no particular need for him to recount the Gospel story.

it would be a real shame if I just invalidated your little fantasy

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

whoops! did I just do that!

my bad

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

related

nobody tell him the reason that "africans" are so "diverse"

2012 <:Thonk:362811285869559808>

nobody tell him that it's because north africans (ie: not black) have an entirely different genetic heritage, and are mostly arab or caucasoid

obviously there is a wide gap between them and sub saharan jungle apes, as evidenced by the fact that they can actually form civilization

I sometimes wonder if sub saharan africans would even exist today had they not been colonized, or whether the dozens of diseases we've helped them survive would have wiped them out

>Evolution in that form

@Fred the Fish thank you for being such an uneducated piece of low hanging fruit, it really helps us dish out the redpills

el graeco has nothing to do with recent out of Africa

and nobody believes the solutrean shit

consensus is not an argument

most facts were contrary to consensus at some point

it's a very implausible theory

stone-age people crossing a 3000 mile ice bridge to go somewhere they wouldn't have even known existed