Message from @Kandarihu
Discord ID: 502831875270901761
<:Thonk:362811285869559808>
Protestants Def yes catholic and orthodox depends on the region
@CaptainDynamite Orthodox Christian here- NO! I don't know if the youngins in my church do it behind closed doors but it's always said that Pre-marital sex is a sin as sex is meant to be something enjoyed between husband and wife!
People who take their faith seriously don't do it
but plenty of people are only Orthodox in name
Thoughts?
The article name for anyone wishing to read it is called *One Nation, Slightly Divisible (2001) by David Brooks*
Basically describes why there will always be race divided by culture and the best we can do is segregate in a very npc tone
Tranny regrets sex change
/instant regret/
I have a better formatted version of this that I made
@NormieCamo oh thanks
why is that the life of a guy who works for the washington post (and it's arab) is sooooo important? how is that one news company has still so much power and can influence the foreign policy of an entire nation? <:HyperThinking:356316737588690944>
it's a mystery
honestly i don't know why anyone links vice articles because it's painfully obvious that they're 100% total clickbait of no real substance and often overt nonsense
giving them page views is just counterintuitive at this point
when people link them it's usually to laugh at them so I guess use archive.is for that
but there's almost no reason to link a vice article in any semi-serious context
**Cole and Ohanian have included in their model one of the most flawed, least effective,
and weakly enforced pieces of New Deal legislation, NIRA. The discussion above points
out that the codes required by this law were not intended primarily to boost economic
growth. It seems fair to ask what would happen if Cole and Ohanian’s model were
modified to take into account all of the major New Deal laws, or at least those thought of
by liberal economists as pro-growth. It would be well-nigh impossible to build such a
model, but there are many reasons to think that it would show that the New Deal greatly
improved growth in the 1930s and even later. ** @agag
This sounds highly speculatory.
From what I'm reading, this is more of a explanitory reason as to why this person disagrees with while providing no other economic model including said portions of the ND, while making claims off of said hypothetical model.
but that's the main issue with what Cole and Ohanian are doing; they're taking one of the most flawed new deal policies, and one that only lasted for two years, and building a model off of it. The more important part is III C, which discusses the flaws with their cartelization hypothesis
@agag But your study, as far as I read, did not make an economic comparison for me to view or for greater knowledge to be grasped from.