Message from @Living The Dream π
Discord ID: 496646799088549899
Lmao I have the right to be a fascist
That's not even true though
@β¦ Slouch β¦ I don't know - how do you define it?
@Citizen Shane I disagree with the second part
Everybody seems to want to define it in their own way nowadays
if you are a country and got a problem, fuck off and solve it yourselves you lazy bastards
<:TrumpSmile:356316463490924561>
Not all Fascism is racist
<:trs:429686216607137813> ***THIS SERVER ABIDES BY DISCORD TOS....AND SO SHOULD YOU!*** <:trs:429686216607137813>
Just the way Hitler did it
The definition I would ride on it scientifically accepting racial differences which is objectively true
O i c
@BPlayzCoD hitler was a naiz
Not a fascist
@Living The Dream π Not necessarily
hey come voiece chat
The fst value between Africans and Europeans is .155 so racial differences are objectively true
Naiz is based on race
There's not even a debate
It's just true
@β¦ Slouch β¦ If you actually look at the definition of racism in the dictionary (most of them), what you just stated usually comprises about half of that definition - but not all of it.
yees
Cringe
Fascism isn't based off racism anyway
@β¦ Slouch β¦ MOST definitions insist that this acknowledgement of racial-differences must then be applied to every single individual - regardless of merit.
However it's more like HBD
Ww2 was more successful
Epic
Do you accept there are differences between races
Actually beating French
@β¦ Slouch β¦ I know, I was just joking. I'm sick of these alt-light Boomers punching right all the time, so I wanted to see if I could actually make the case for their luke-warm "conservatism."
Germany had a chance to win ww1
but not ww2
Who said i was
@Citizen Shane I can play this to
@Citizen Shane NatSoc and Fascism are two completely different ideologies that can fit together like a puzzle piece
@β¦ Slouch β¦ Your statements were all very sound
Youβre a racist Shane