Wikipedia has its sources clearly annotated

Yeah lmao

Wikipedia not being reliable is a myth by college professors to make students work harder

Martin Luther king junior was my nigga

It might not be as in depth as other sources

hey guys I'm new

But it is certainly reliable

We wuz kings

Martin Luther wanted to tear apart the bible because he knew it went against prot doctrine

says so right on wikipedia

He was a finding

Hello @too many smoothies

he wanted to take out the pieces romans added in to put them in power

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luther%27s_canon

MLK jr as a man of god

Amen

Dindu*

and create a government to control the religion

just like they did with greek gods and everything else they manipulated

Luther made an attempt to remove the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation from the canon (notably, he perceived them to go against certain Protestant doctrines such as sola gratia and sola fide)

do you think christ would include all the pagan holidays?

just to get more people to join the church?

Yeah Luther hated the Book of John too

christ turned water to wine for some reason

Wine tastes good

because wine was less dangerous to drink

That too

Is Luther based

alcohol killed bacteria

To turn water into wine you just need to take some protons out

@Supreme Leader Kim 🧧 no he is a satanist

....

Sola Gratia is awful

k

mmm.....

Opposite of based

~~The Book Of John is considered "debatable"~~ By Majority Of Outspoken Atheistic Groups

But I really don't think so

No its not

not by catholics

Oh sorry I didn't mean that