Message from @irix
Discord ID: 497980482852487169
Pesticides, if misused, can become toxic to the user and may deem harmful, thus they should be regulated - but not banned entirely.
should rape be legal
Unless they're modified with a pesticide like Roundup, I don't see an issue.
We need greater yields of corn to feed unending amounts of somalis - Monsanto
It's important to keep in mind that there are numerous pesticidal compounds out there.
Assuming you're talking about the pesticides used on farms, yeah, there's no problem
should goverments provide an universal basic income
oof
No.
*pulls out dick*
Lube it
Flick it
Twist it
Pull it
BOP IT
*nuts*
Oops, accidentally created herbicide resistant superweeds because we needed more fucking corn. Whoops!
No, since it isn't working elsewhere whatsoever.
I want more corn
Canada dropped their income plan.
Chicago is trying one rn
Don't believe it's working last time I heard
Oopsie, ecological collapse is now entirely possible because I can't stop fucking with nature! Dang!
Kek
Probably
Superweeds are hardly that 'super.' Given that they're weeds, their rate of development is lowly and these weeds are only resistant to one or two compounds out there.
Drumpf is letting them spray on wildlife refuges.
Which chaps my ass.
The never-ending pocket of Somalis just happen to turn a great profit.
GMO farmers end up using more herbicide, till more, and profit less. GMOs are the solution to what was never a problem
It's not profit at the hands of those farmers, but the corporation distributing and selling the genetically modified organisms.
^
Quite a few of them can't asexually or sexually reproduce at all.
Which requires a constant purchase of new seeds.
They're also legally barred from doing so.
There's a hefty amount of paper a farmer needs to sign which will prevent them from reproducing or distributing the organisms (the seeds).
It's a pretty solid business strategy, and as long as there's a demand, a profit will turn. Of course, I'm not trying to justify the practice at all and it's clearly unethical.
I'm anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitist. I don't care how Jews run their lives, but I know they do have a hand in the 1% that controls the entire fucking world. It's literal fact.
"The 1%" is the sort of narrative created and fueled by that very 'one percent.'
fuck semitics
OOF
are you guys pro choice
Being an anti-Zionist without addressing the Zionists is an issue. Jews inherently have in-group preference throughout history, and do so in such a way that is genuinely insidious. This is an internal issue with the Jewish culture that must either be resolved in some way, shape, or form. It is not happenstance that the same cycle happens over and over again with a specific group @Cawaii
An abortion shouldn't be conceivable as a medical procedure until detriment to either the bearer, or the child.