essentially

and it's not a literary device

because Yahweh is speaking alone to Satan in this part

no he brought up Biblical criticism that says that God does the same thing elsewhere

for effect

to a human

the difference is important

because Satan being an ex angel would be aware of the nature of God

and thus no literary figure would be necessary

Adam having met God face-to-face and interacting directly with Him would also be aware of the nature of God

the other thing you're missing is this is a book being written for men

Adam didn't know anything though

hence the knowledge thing

@Thule-Gesellschaft [☩] God knew that people would need to read the Bible and spoke for our sake

^

wait but nobody was here to witness this

it was inspired in someone's mind

why would it be done so?

This just pisses me off all over again, are the Dems really trying to rally us more so we win 2018???

why would it not simply have Yahweh speaking to Satan about Job

without the formality of asking him "where he came from?" twice

doesn't make sense

you are again throwing away logic where it suits you

common trend among fanatics

because that's the way the author decided to write it?

That too

by that logic can't we say that many events were lied about?

the author lied?

that's your argument now?

You can say that about any part of the Bible

it's not lying

no you can't

You're trying to fit God into human logic, that doesn't work, because we made what we view as logical. @Thule-Gesellschaft [☩]

this part is unique

Anyone got news reporter mind on posting what I just put in chat?

because Yahweh is speaking to Satan another metaphysical entity

not speaking ot a human

and because Yahweh does this *twice*

God wanted to use words

not once

The huge flaw here is trying to apply God to humanly formed logic.