it's not an illusion, it's a metaphysical concept which is necessary

what is actually illusion is the temporal physical world

the metaphysics, the substrata conceptual invariant world is not illusory

yes you argue essentialism

ok , if you try to divide by zero you will always get infinity, no matter if you swap processors or not does that naswer your question

i say the essential is reaction impression from planck scale reality

machines says theres no objective truth but we create dmachines

what is with niggers and dragon ball z???

@hemi the holographic planck scale reality thing doesn't matter because even at the tiniest fractional sub atomic level the metaphysical invariant conceptual differentiation stuff applies

the idea of a ball came from see a thing roll down a hill

What is with new users and anime pfp's?

you're just reducing your position into absurdity

a thing rolling down a hill didnt come from the idea of a ball

thats not absurd at all thats logic lol

which is why atheism, agnosticism, and pantheism/monism are reductio ad absurdum positions necessarily

they rely on deconstruction of reality to then make their position that there is unity, or that there is no absolute truth

what other approach is there?

yh u just triggred me

the approach through metaphysics

the understanding of things as more than their temporal substance

<:GWragChad:390321737230843905>

fucking vedics

metaphysics is of the mind which is an emergent complexity of consciousness. this mind is negentropy

I wanna call it wholistic, but that word has been hijacked by new age faggots

no, it's not just a property of the brain or mind

consciousness or Atman relies on metaphysics

he thinks that everything being energy is reductio abusrdum

will itself is a function of a sort of sub logos identity that we all have

look up Aristotelian self actualization argument

consciousness is being researched objectively now

matter is composed of energy

@hemi no it's not

because consciousness cannot be understood on a relativistic basis

yes it is

lol sorry friend

it again reduces into absurdity

may i post research?

there is plenty

because deterministic chain of causation for impetus of neuronal firing or whatever you're looking at has no overall basis

yh hemi is rightt though

20 yrs of it