and utilitarians

the point is about appointed successors not about drawing a connection between Commies and Nazis

the two systems don't lead to the same conclusions because of those distinctions

you're horseshoe theory fagging now

ns =/= communism because they shared some authoritarian elements

authoritarianism existed in hereditary monarchies which were theocratic almost

they were not like communism

He’s talking about successors potatobrain not ideology = ideology

that is not an argument

I know you dumb fag teenager reactionary

I am trying to explain that the succession is entirely different because of the ns axioms.

And the epistemology of rejecting enlightenment rationalism, utilitarianism etc.

NS were not utilitarians or these super efficient robot people like movies show them as, they are idealists.

They were not pragmatists either

Hitler fundamentally rejects pragmatism

people are people regardless of ideology, I'm sure Lenin thought that Stalin was an "idealistic Marxist" that "doesn't reject global revolution."

even with completely different standards you will end up with successors who go back on their previous behavior

ok, but if you take that argument to its logical conclusion, in the plutocratic shadow elite version the "people who are people" who become tyrants through the weaknesses of capitalist democracies are harder to then overthrow

Power corrupts the very minute it’s given

which means your system in which corruption is inevitable anyways because of this maxim leads to even greater danger than mine

the checks and balances built into the system exist to prevent that

since unlike your system we might have one tyrant

the problem is that with Führerprinzip you don't have them

whereas you may have 200 billionaire tyrants

checks and balances have failed

unless you're arguing that America is not a plutocracy

I don't think we're a plutocracy

Can we check and balance niggers

ok then explain why super pacs are allowed?

citizens united

essentially infinite lobbying enacted

super pacs are regulated

not really

what are super pacs?

not as much as they should be but they are

the regulations for who donates are pretty shitty

foreigners can donate too btw

as long as they do it through a US corporate entity

look I don't want to go into a tangent proving America is a plutocracy, it is but that would be a waste of time

super pacs prove it outright imo

but there's other points to that