look at Lenin -> Stalin

because a hereditary monarchy can have a successive king who's retarded

or who's not ideologically even a monarchist

Stalin more or less stole the throne from under Lenin at the last second

@agag false equivalency

communism =/= ns

the axiomatic presuppositions in ns are entirely different

Lenin saw Stalin’s real colors at the last second

we are idealistic racialists and we don't reject God

Trotsky was the true successor

communists are materialistic empiricists

and utilitarians

the point is about appointed successors not about drawing a connection between Commies and Nazis

the two systems don't lead to the same conclusions because of those distinctions

you're horseshoe theory fagging now

ns =/= communism because they shared some authoritarian elements

authoritarianism existed in hereditary monarchies which were theocratic almost

they were not like communism

He’s talking about successors potatobrain not ideology = ideology

that is not an argument

I know you dumb fag teenager reactionary

I am trying to explain that the succession is entirely different because of the ns axioms.

And the epistemology of rejecting enlightenment rationalism, utilitarianism etc.

NS were not utilitarians or these super efficient robot people like movies show them as, they are idealists.

They were not pragmatists either

Hitler fundamentally rejects pragmatism

people are people regardless of ideology, I'm sure Lenin thought that Stalin was an "idealistic Marxist" that "doesn't reject global revolution."

even with completely different standards you will end up with successors who go back on their previous behavior

ok, but if you take that argument to its logical conclusion, in the plutocratic shadow elite version the "people who are people" who become tyrants through the weaknesses of capitalist democracies are harder to then overthrow

Power corrupts the very minute it’s given

which means your system in which corruption is inevitable anyways because of this maxim leads to even greater danger than mine

the checks and balances built into the system exist to prevent that

since unlike your system we might have one tyrant

the problem is that with Führerprinzip you don't have them

whereas you may have 200 billionaire tyrants

checks and balances have failed

unless you're arguing that America is not a plutocracy

I don't think we're a plutocracy

Can we check and balance niggers

ok then explain why super pacs are allowed?

citizens united