did hitler ever talk about this process?

You should see LA @thrill_house

i don't research areas littered with mexicans

The epistemology behind the volkish concept logically leads to the preservation of the volk in a collective that transcends legal distinctions. Which would imo dilute the dialectical tension between state and governed.

wh-

And all would be state

@agag In his way ya

i wrote the entire state of CA off a long time ago

I wonder how much disaster insurance costs in Oklahoma or Florida

la property tax isn't that bad cause of prop 13

yes but LA has Hispanics

I'd say it's analogous to how we can take very complicated philosophical principles from the bible, yet the language there was simple. Not saying that mein kampf was the bible or that it's a religious text, just saying that the less rigorous ideas of Hitler can be used as an axiomatic basis for a very rich ideology.

I'd gladly pay a few hundred / month to not live near minorities

*extra few

So while Hitler might not have written about volkish identity like I do, the axioms he established lead to my views

the views he had were similar though

Is Vril still spewing his garbage?

If I had to move to OKC and start a business, I’d easily create a disaster insurance that spikes rates per disaster

@Vril-Gesellschaft I'm not talking about volkish identity I'm talking about that succession process

hitler wasn't the first volkisch guy

why OKC

Succession is simpler than in monarchies. The Fuhrer simply appoints his successor and its bound by law.

Tornadoes, hail storms, microbursts, Derechos, you name it @thrill_house

then you'll end up with Stalin

why do you want to live in an area that isn't 90% or more white

There's less chance of conflict for power, because unlike in a hereditary monarchy where several sons or lords may contest for power, in a dictatorship the dictator's chosen candidate becomes leader.

I’m saying *if I had to*

And it has a more meritocratic element and element of continuity

dictator's choose shitty candidates

look at Lenin -> Stalin

because a hereditary monarchy can have a successive king who's retarded

or who's not ideologically even a monarchist

Stalin more or less stole the throne from under Lenin at the last second

@agag false equivalency

communism =/= ns

the axiomatic presuppositions in ns are entirely different

Lenin saw Stalin’s real colors at the last second

we are idealistic racialists and we don't reject God

Trotsky was the true successor

communists are materialistic empiricists

and utilitarians