Message from Biga S in The Ice Wall #lounge
the machine tells you. if you wanna go into detail of how the machine works - i stated a link
cool thanks will check it out
You kinda need that before anything else on your globe. You need a working core to generate enough pull to gather mass. Once enough mass has been accumulated, you can produce a gravitational field.
You need that molten metal core to produce magnetism before anything.
@Biga S Good luck.
No you dont need a molten core to produce gravity
Cite any source you wish. Just need a scientific method experiment to support it.
Otherwise, how did earth pull anything to it?
I'm sorry i can explain but i just dont know what you mean
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄
well, isn't it true that if absolutely everything came from absolutely nothing that absolutely anything is possible @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄
let's switch a subject and chellenge you, explain ME something for once. explain me how a solar echlipse works on a flat earth model. i would be fascinated
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Cavendish, Paul Heyl proved the existence of the gravitational force
Please prove it was not Sheeples seventh law of acceleration?
7. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/LvRVZ5E
Please prove to me it was not the ninth law 9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF
And MOST likely, considering Cavendish did not even have a vacuum, prove it was not the third law
3. APPLICATION OF PRESSURE VECTORS https://imgur.com/a/g6eAkG6
LOL you changed subjects AND refuced to explain
@Human Sheeple here just sending random things that dont have anything to do with what we're talking about
thank you for this amazing debate
Scientific method means you have to eliminate your null hypothesis in order to conclude your main hypothesis, your null hypothesis is mass DOES NOT cause acceleration
@Biga S if you can accept just for one minute that we've been lied to .. and that there just may be another dark sun that we haven't officially been told about that crosses the sun's path every now and again creating a shadow and an effect resulting in an eclipse ... well, that's a good explanation but a conspiratorial one of course.
Accepting is'nt the way to go 😃 - PROVING is. i have so much proof of the globe earth that it's just not debatable for most people - however i challenge myself to debate
@Biga S It actually does If you bother to research anything but what public school teaches you.
Now one more sentence and im out of this place: (it will take me long to type)
***LA LA LA LA LAAAAAA!!!
LA LA LAAA!!!***
basiclly, experts using "Globe earthers" formulas - calculated the EXACT time and date and WHERE the solar echlipse in 2017would accure, it worked sooo perfectly using out models
NOW TRY TO DEBUNK ME SUCCERS
@Biga S They have EVERYTHING to do with Cavendish experiment, you are using an independent variable MASS which is your asserted cause to MEASURE your dependent variable , which is your effect which would be ACCELERATION.
So prove to me the CAUSE of the ACCLERATION was MASS
or most importantly, pressure vectors.
NO IT DOESNT it has everything to do with GRAVITY - WHICH RUINS your whole flat earth theory - case closed you are done for real im out not listening bye