# Message from Biga S in The Ice Wall#lounge

2019-04-07 18:46:15 UTC

the machine tells you. if you wanna go into detail of how the machine works - i stated a link

2019-04-07 18:46:38 UTC

cool thanks will check it out

2019-04-07 18:46:44 UTC

no problem

2019-04-07 18:47:27 UTC

You kinda need that before anything else on your globe. You need a working core to generate enough pull to gather mass. Once enough mass has been accumulated, you can produce a gravitational field.
***BUT!***
You need that molten metal core to produce magnetism before anything.
@Biga S Good luck.

2019-04-07 18:47:57 UTC

No you dont need a molten core to produce gravity

2019-04-07 18:48:05 UTC

Cite any source you wish. Just need a scientific method experiment to support it.

2019-04-07 18:48:09 UTC
2019-04-07 18:48:30 UTC

Otherwise, how did earth pull anything to it?

2019-04-07 18:48:30 UTC

I'm sorry i can explain but i just dont know what you mean

2019-04-07 18:48:44 UTC

well, isn't it true that if absolutely everything came from absolutely nothing that absolutely anything is possible @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

2019-04-07 18:50:00 UTC

let's switch a subject and chellenge you, explain ME something for once. explain me how a solar echlipse works on a flat earth model. i would be fascinated

2019-04-07 18:50:01 UTC

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Cavendish, Paul Heyl proved the existence of the gravitational force

2019-04-07 18:51:39 UTC

@Kevin Dish Please can you prove to me that in the Cavendish experiment the cause of the acceleration WAS NOT Sheeple's sixth law of acceleration?
6. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-STATIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/pfqfVww

2019-04-07 18:51:58 UTC

Please prove it was not Sheeples seventh law of acceleration?
7. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/LvRVZ5E

2019-04-07 18:52:18 UTC

Please prove to me it was not the ninth law 9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF

2019-04-07 18:52:20 UTC

@Kevin Dish I doubt it. You first need a molten or superheated core that can produce magnetism before you can claim anything of gravity. There is no getting around that. @Biga S No changing subjects just because you hit a snag.

2019-04-07 18:52:42 UTC

And MOST likely, considering Cavendish did not even have a vacuum, prove it was not the third law
3. APPLICATION OF PRESSURE VECTORS https://imgur.com/a/g6eAkG6

2019-04-07 18:52:43 UTC

LOL you changed subjects AND refuced to explain

2019-04-07 18:53:06 UTC

@Human Sheeple here just sending random things that dont have anything to do with what we're talking about

2019-04-07 18:53:14 UTC

thank you for this amazing debate

2019-04-07 18:53:21 UTC

Scientific method means you have to eliminate your null hypothesis in order to conclude your main hypothesis, your null hypothesis is mass DOES NOT cause acceleration

2019-04-07 18:53:38 UTC

@Biga S if you can accept just for one minute that we've been lied to .. and that there just may be another dark sun that we haven't officially been told about that crosses the sun's path every now and again creating a shadow and an effect resulting in an eclipse ... well, that's a good explanation but a conspiratorial one of course.

2019-04-07 18:54:36 UTC

Accepting is'nt the way to go 😃 - PROVING is. i have so much proof of the globe earth that it's just not debatable for most people - however i challenge myself to debate

2019-04-07 18:54:56 UTC

@Biga S It actually does If you bother to research anything but what public school teaches you.

2019-04-07 18:55:12 UTC

Now one more sentence and im out of this place: (it will take me long to type)

2019-04-07 18:55:16 UTC
2019-04-07 18:55:22 UTC

Nope

2019-04-07 18:55:52 UTC

***LA LA LA LA LAAAAAA!!!
LA LA LAAA!!!***

2019-04-07 18:56:10 UTC

2019-04-07 18:56:13 UTC

basiclly, experts using "Globe earthers" formulas - calculated the EXACT time and date and WHERE the solar echlipse in 2017would accure, it worked sooo perfectly using out models

2019-04-07 18:56:24 UTC

NOW TRY TO DEBUNK ME SUCCERS

2019-04-07 18:56:25 UTC

bye now

2019-04-07 18:57:04 UTC

@Biga S They have EVERYTHING to do with Cavendish experiment, you are using an independent variable MASS which is your asserted cause to MEASURE your dependent variable , which is your effect which would be ACCELERATION.

2019-04-07 18:57:32 UTC

@Biga S Astrolabe

2019-04-07 18:57:35 UTC

So prove to me the CAUSE of the ACCLERATION was MASS
and NOT
Static,
Magnetism
Waves
or most importantly, pressure vectors.

2019-04-07 18:57:36 UTC

Done

2019-04-07 18:57:45 UTC

@Biga S Astrolabe

2019-04-07 18:57:47 UTC

Done

2019-04-07 18:57:51 UTC

NO IT DOESNT it has everything to do with GRAVITY - WHICH RUINS your whole flat earth theory - case closed you are done for real im out not listening bye

2019-04-07 18:58:16 UTC

@Biga S I agree