great so we established photons have an end

LIGHT CURVES UP

LIGHT CURVES UP

@!GPT No, photons don't have an end. They have a point at which they stop being "visible"

thats an end

"It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Tempera
ture to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air preEsure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "

INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY

https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html

"In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky."

@Fading May I see a photograph of a photon please

if i were to walk downa road and come to cliff and cannot travel any further

@Human Sheeple is that a troll question?

that would be what

the end

@!GPT The end of your journey, perhaps? But the photon continues whether or not you can see it (if I'm correct in assuming you're talking about light falloff)

@Fading no it really isn't photograph of a photon or it didn't happen you liar

@Human Sheeple I guess you'll have to consider me a liar then Sheeple, it's a sad day

i just think you love cartoons is all

there are flat earthers all around the globe

<@565177355111497738> That would be really cool

The earth is flat

It is a fac tmartians hate NEW YORK City

damn new york city causing light pollution on mars

cant see the stars

pluto is also effected by new york light pollution

something needs to be done

The camera isn't strong enough to catch the star light

You need really sensitive cameras for that

Heated debate here

@!GPT the exposure is wrong for capturing stars

Like you can't take good pictures of stars with your phone camera

or any at all

25$ cam

<@565177355111497738> Really cool theory but is there any reason to believe that's the case

https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php

no problem catching stars 25$ camera LOL

and thats during the daytime with a solar filter

lol