Message from @jeremy

Discord ID: 576042321217585174


2019-05-09 13:35:55 UTC  

good its easy math so why wasnt the moon brighter

2019-05-09 13:36:03 UTC  

brighter when?

2019-05-09 13:36:04 UTC  

where

2019-05-09 13:36:12 UTC  

sigh

2019-05-09 13:36:13 UTC  

lmao

2019-05-09 13:36:21 UTC  

apollo mission

2019-05-09 13:36:21 UTC  

like in general+

2019-05-09 13:36:24 UTC  

oh

2019-05-09 13:36:37 UTC  

u jumped in here like a firecracker first off hello

2019-05-09 13:36:40 UTC  

What do you mean why wasnt it brighter?

2019-05-09 13:36:42 UTC  

oh hi btw

2019-05-09 13:37:02 UTC  

Wait lemme scroll up and read

2019-05-09 13:37:04 UTC  

doesnt the inverse square law make light brighter the closer u get

2019-05-09 13:37:49 UTC  

or dimmer the farther u get away from the light

2019-05-09 13:37:57 UTC  

by a very specific amount

2019-05-09 13:39:55 UTC  

Can you post ur argument again

2019-05-09 13:40:00 UTC  

or point whatever sorry

2019-05-09 13:40:22 UTC  

on the apollo missions shouldnt the moon have been much brighter according to the inverse square law

2019-05-09 13:40:58 UTC  

i know it only applies when u can see the whole light in one frame but their was points where it should have been like what a billion lumens lol

2019-05-09 13:42:39 UTC  

i never did the math but it would have to be an insane amount brighter

2019-05-09 13:46:31 UTC  

ive got issues with the brightness of the moon at multiple points during the apollo mission but i think approaching is the biggest one cause their is a law that proves it should have been brighter

2019-05-09 13:48:08 UTC  

noone has anything to say to that ?

2019-05-09 14:00:18 UTC  
2019-05-09 14:13:18 UTC  

The moon was brighter, they were standing right on it

2019-05-09 14:13:56 UTC  

But what measurement of Q don't think is suspect?

2019-05-09 14:17:41 UTC  
2019-05-09 14:17:42 UTC  

im talking about the point before they landed or after they took off

2019-05-09 14:17:54 UTC  

Inverse square law does apply to a reflective surface when a light source reaches it, although the inverse square law usually refers to sources of light. But you have to take in the account of how much light is actually reflected. The moon actualy has a lower albedo than earth, at 0.12 compared to 0. 33 of the earth

2019-05-09 14:18:02 UTC  

@PsyClone You're verified please post an image in rejoice

2019-05-09 14:18:11 UTC  

Im not too sure but this is what i think is happening

2019-05-09 14:18:47 UTC  

well the earth in the picture didnt look too bright or as big as the moon for that matter

2019-05-09 14:20:18 UTC  

but their was points they showed the moon when they we reconnecting with the guy that looped around the moon or points when they were approaching the moon where the inverse square law could have applied

2019-05-09 14:20:22 UTC  

no ?

2019-05-09 14:20:56 UTC  

Can you please explain that again?

2019-05-09 14:20:57 UTC  

Hello flatties

2019-05-09 14:21:25 UTC  

Dont mess

2019-05-09 14:22:34 UTC  

The earth is flat dont worry about that

2019-05-09 14:22:35 UTC  

moon should have been brighter

2019-05-09 14:22:43 UTC  

also that looks so fake its ridiculous

2019-05-09 14:22:54 UTC  

Every one knows the sun is fake