Message from @Jeop

Discord ID: 576051102374428683


2019-05-09 13:39:55 UTC  

Can you post ur argument again

2019-05-09 13:40:00 UTC  

or point whatever sorry

2019-05-09 13:40:22 UTC  

on the apollo missions shouldnt the moon have been much brighter according to the inverse square law

2019-05-09 13:40:58 UTC  

i know it only applies when u can see the whole light in one frame but their was points where it should have been like what a billion lumens lol

2019-05-09 13:42:39 UTC  

i never did the math but it would have to be an insane amount brighter

2019-05-09 13:46:31 UTC  

ive got issues with the brightness of the moon at multiple points during the apollo mission but i think approaching is the biggest one cause their is a law that proves it should have been brighter

2019-05-09 13:48:08 UTC  

noone has anything to say to that ?

2019-05-09 14:00:18 UTC  
2019-05-09 14:13:18 UTC  

The moon was brighter, they were standing right on it

2019-05-09 14:13:56 UTC  

But what measurement of Q don't think is suspect?

2019-05-09 14:17:41 UTC  
2019-05-09 14:17:42 UTC  

im talking about the point before they landed or after they took off

2019-05-09 14:17:54 UTC  

Inverse square law does apply to a reflective surface when a light source reaches it, although the inverse square law usually refers to sources of light. But you have to take in the account of how much light is actually reflected. The moon actualy has a lower albedo than earth, at 0.12 compared to 0. 33 of the earth

2019-05-09 14:18:02 UTC  

@PsyClone You're verified please post an image in rejoice

2019-05-09 14:18:11 UTC  

Im not too sure but this is what i think is happening

2019-05-09 14:18:47 UTC  

well the earth in the picture didnt look too bright or as big as the moon for that matter

2019-05-09 14:20:18 UTC  

but their was points they showed the moon when they we reconnecting with the guy that looped around the moon or points when they were approaching the moon where the inverse square law could have applied

2019-05-09 14:20:22 UTC  

no ?

2019-05-09 14:20:56 UTC  

Can you please explain that again?

2019-05-09 14:20:57 UTC  

Hello flatties

2019-05-09 14:21:25 UTC  

Dont mess

2019-05-09 14:22:34 UTC  

The earth is flat dont worry about that

2019-05-09 14:22:35 UTC  

moon should have been brighter

2019-05-09 14:22:43 UTC  

also that looks so fake its ridiculous

2019-05-09 14:22:54 UTC  

Every one knows the sun is fake

2019-05-09 14:22:59 UTC  

if u speed that video up it looks ridiculous

2019-05-09 14:23:01 UTC  

How flat it looks is based on perspective

2019-05-09 14:23:37 UTC  

The moon generates power and it hits the earths water and it reflects it to the star field fermented making a reflection and a glare that is the sun

2019-05-09 14:24:02 UTC  

Now you still have to keep in mind that the moon has a lower albedo than that of the earth

2019-05-09 14:24:12 UTC  

Yes

2019-05-09 14:24:14 UTC  

yes but does the inverse sqare law not apply ?

2019-05-09 14:24:16 UTC  

Im aware

2019-05-09 14:24:36 UTC  

The universe is a pyramid

2019-05-09 14:24:53 UTC  

Im not an expert on this, im just explaining this based on what i know

2019-05-09 14:24:53 UTC  

If it even exists

2019-05-09 14:25:16 UTC  

We wanna make it to the underground of the earth

2019-05-09 14:25:19 UTC  

hmm i thought everyone in here was an expert at everything to do with space and nasa and perspective and navigation and .....

2019-05-09 14:25:30 UTC  

@Human Sheeple An image in rejoice? haha

2019-05-09 14:25:52 UTC  

Yes you must post an image

2019-05-09 14:25:59 UTC  

It is tradition for verifieds to do so