...

I'm not proposing a way to do it, I'm just saying it's something they should do.

There are legal and public perception implications when it comes to reaching out to underage children.

Which is why it isn't done.

Don't left wing groups do it?

This is also why cuckservative groups like TPUSA are only on college campuses.

Like pro-lgbt groups?

Maybe through media, beyond that, not really.

Those groups also operate within the sphere of the cathedral, so it wouldn't be an issue for them like it would be for us.

I appreciate your criticism, but most of these things have already been considered and decided upon for a reason.

I see..

If you had some ideas or direction on what should be done, I'd be all ears.

Not trying to neg you motivated young dudes into the ground, but most of your concerns have already been considered and eschewed for very good reasons.

I wish I had been redpilled at your age, in a way.

I redpilled myself.

I come from an ultra conservative backround so when I saw what happened to rhodesia and SA it wasn't that hard.

South Africa huh?

Would you think some sort of activism focused around the SA genocide would be a positive thing?

Propaganda, flashy videos from groups like GI, IE serve as 'youth outreach' as does social media. Beyond that, I don't see much more that can be done, while still maintaining a reasonable reputation and legal safety.

Imagine a journalist uncovering GI going to highschools and kiddie pop concerts (think Taylor Swift, Grande, etc) and trying to recruit them.

Imagine the "child grooming into far right politics" headlines

We need to think outside of the box, but there is a very good reason that metapolitical organizations operate in the manner that they do, on both sides.

So what are your guys standings on multiculturalism?

A nation can have a negligible amount of ethnic diversity (1-5%) and still remain cohesive, and have little risk of a 5th column forming. Beyond that it's a detriment.

Mono-bicultural nations and societies are objectively strongest, socially.

Multiculturalism only works in a nation where cultures have many common factors that tie them together. Not this fucked up version we have today.

I personnaly believe that multiculturalism is not a viable basis for society as it robs people of all ethnic backgrounds of their heritage causing a culture clash and a lack of social cohesion. America cannot become welfare centres for all the economic migrants of the world and the policy of caring for the Illegals must end. The most valuable foreign aid we can give the Third World is the incentivised voluntary return of migrants to build prosperity in their countries of origin using the education and work skills they have acquired while in the US.

multiculturism is fine

but it doesnt work in big countries

there can be too much diversity that destroys the spirit of the original race that spawned the country

but there can never be too little diversity <:dab:378699566561755137>

Multi-culturism is ***NOT*** fine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3BCt7t9TwU

Potential white pill?

probably nothing will come of it in terms of actual action taken

again

😦

well its something at least

"oh hey you did this and that wrong but for some reason you're not gonna get punished haha federal government is really good guys and totally not rotten to the core"

Democracy is the same. It only works in a group of like minded people.

Otherwise its essentially the tyranny of the masses.