Like he said, we need to be harsher than nazis towards nonwhites.

And I agree with that bit.

@Kombat-Unit yes

<:hellyeah:376968731156414464> <:heimbowlstroll:388542976269221888>

I think Yockey made some wonderful criticism of capitalism in the book, the "Socialism of Duty" quotes him quote extensively.

Again, I’ll say the ethnically homogeneous society is the most important part tbh

And wrote about the spiritual aspect of the communist/capitalist clash. Wonderful stuff.

Good.

non white corpses make the best manure

Priorities in order.

Arguing about economics before we've cleansed Earth is pointless imo

But, having also worked inside the government, I’d never want to rely on a bureaucracy to allocate capital efficiently

"In general, it is a question not of nominal possession but of the technique of administration. For a slogan’s sake to buy up enterprises immoderately and purposelessly and to turn them over to public administration in the place of the initiative and responsibility of their owners, who must eventually lose all power of supervision—that means the destruction of socialism. The old Prussian idea was to bring under legislative control the formal structure of the whole national productive force, at the same time carefully preserving the right of property and inheritance, and leaving scope for the kind of personal enterprise, talent, energy, and intellect displayed by an experienced chess player, playing within the rules of the game and enjoying that sort of freedom which the very sway of the rule affords….Socialization means the slow transformation—taking centuries to complete—of the worker into an economic functionary, and the employer into a responsible supervisory official"

Bureaucracies are terribly inefficient

Like Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, the race question will always be the most important one, and although economics are difference between starvation and life, it can only ever come second. I'd rather have white juche than brown libertarianism.

Not Bowlocracies

I’m not defending the current libertarian status quo

Seize the means of niggerdeath

But property rights and privately held capital are important to long term prosperity

That feel when burgers call you a collectivist leftist racist like antifas 🤔

It’s a moot point in a mud society, though

@Kombat-Unit there's that left wing fascist talk we talked about

@Kombat-Unit I've been called that three times today

Maybe I’m wrong but I thought national socialism allowed property rights and private capital

It did

It does

I know you hold race as most important, and that's fine, but you do know how libertarianism has infected some boomer burgers so they feel all collective efforts to protect race are communism and they'd rather drown in mud flood. Also Hitler was a communist, even though he tried to destroy USSR, and we helped Stalin out. muh individualism

Who here NAZBOWL GANG

Basic bitch libertarians are some of the most enraging faggots to argue with

@Sammy Woodchipperz I does but it also calls for nationalization when deemed good, and that’s high time preference wrongthink

ancaps are worse

Honestly, I hate so called "freedoms".

libertarian-ism fails because it does not account for the fact that all throughout the history of successful white societies there were restrictions on "freedoms".....I don't have the right to fuck your daughter before I marry her just because I think she's attractive etc.......I don't have the right to worship Islam just because I do so discreetly in the privacy of my own home etc.

Some industries should be nationalized though. Healthcare for instance should not be a for-profit enterprise. The health of the race is more important than money and should be available to anyone within the race that needs it no matter how obscure their affliction

I believe in a ethnically homogenous society with a strong sense of nation, many of these concerns simply wouldn’t be pertinent

"The point that libertarianism is Jewish in origin has already been discussed extensively before, and I won’t rehash that here. Needless to say, ethnic minorities who occupy White countries (like the Jews) do not adopt a libertarian ethic, but quite the opposite. Ethnic favoritism is at the core of their success.

Ultimately, the state is a tool. Whether it is good or bad depends on who is using it and for what purpose. The American government isn’t evil because it’s big and bloated. Imagine what this monstrously large institution could do in the hands of good men who care about the future of White people. Practically all of our ills could be cured in record time.

Individualism is a loser’s strategy in life’s game of survival of the fittest. Even for a cynical observer, it is indisputable that teamwork (and thus cooperation and empathy) are superior to individual effort: if might makes right, two men with sticks are mightier than one man alone.

The enemies of our people want us weak. With Marxism, they make us weak individually so that it matters not if we unite our forces. Through libertarianism, they insure that the strong among us stay isolated rather than uniting their powers and posing a threat."

Marxism and Libertarianism, when presented this way, seem diametrically opposed; one believes in equality of ability but a moral hierarchy, while the other believes in moral equality but a hierarchy of ability. But both are still based on the liberal lie of equality—they just apply it differently. To the weak-minded emotional thinker, it is easier to accept the victim mentality that comes with Marxism, while to the rugged individualist it’s easier to accept the idea that everyone is selfish and that all authority is evil.

*This is what the average libertarian will look like by 2050, and it's beautiful.*

I disagree with that @Krieg, healthcare is fucked because we live in a mud society, not because socialized medicine is inherently better

HA

HA