Message from @YUGE
Discord ID: 405239407591817219
you actually don't know what the socialism in national socialism means
The name national socialism was mostly branding
"The folkish philosophy is fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason of the fact that the former recognizes the significance of race and therefore also personal worth and has made these the pillars of its structure. These are the most important factors of its view of life.
If the National Socialist Movement should fail to understand the fundamental importance of this essential principle, if it should merely varnish the external appearance of the present State and adopt the majority principle, it would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground. For that reason it would not have the right to call itself a philosophy of life. If the social programme of the movement consisted in eliminating personality and putting the multitude in its place, then National Socialism would be corrupted with the poison of Marxism, just as our national-bourgeois parties are. " - MK
"It's not the socialism of Marx, but the socialism of..." is the exact same thing I'm doing with "its not the libertarianism of Rand or other jews, it's the libertarianism of..."
Natsoc Germany had several nationalized industries
It’s not just a name
You need to read prussianism and socialism
Sammy think about it
R
E
A
D
S
I
E
G
E
Hitler very well pointed out in MK, how conservacucks, like libertarians, are actually closer to commies than Nazis since they're both race denying egalitarians.
I have faith in you SAmmy
I’m aware of the basis of natsoc Germany
Natsoc Germany didn’t exist long enough for its flaws to come to fruition
@YUGE Have you read the Imperium?
Normally I'd agree, @Kombat-Unit, but how does that explain Alex Linder?
By Francis Parker Yockey
Linder is the only libertarian I respect, alright, because he doesn't fit the mold really.
"The meaning of socialism is that life is controlled not by the opposition between rich and poor, but by the rank that achievement and talent bestow. That is our freedom, freedom from the economic despotism of the individual.
Like he said, we need to be harsher than nazis towards nonwhites.
And I agree with that bit.
@Kombat-Unit yes
<:hellyeah:376968731156414464> <:heimbowlstroll:388542976269221888>
I think Yockey made some wonderful criticism of capitalism in the book, the "Socialism of Duty" quotes him quote extensively.
Again, I’ll say the ethnically homogeneous society is the most important part tbh
And wrote about the spiritual aspect of the communist/capitalist clash. Wonderful stuff.
Good.
non white corpses make the best manure
Priorities in order.
Arguing about economics before we've cleansed Earth is pointless imo
But, having also worked inside the government, I’d never want to rely on a bureaucracy to allocate capital efficiently
"In general, it is a question not of nominal possession but of the technique of administration. For a slogan’s sake to buy up enterprises immoderately and purposelessly and to turn them over to public administration in the place of the initiative and responsibility of their owners, who must eventually lose all power of supervision—that means the destruction of socialism. The old Prussian idea was to bring under legislative control the formal structure of the whole national productive force, at the same time carefully preserving the right of property and inheritance, and leaving scope for the kind of personal enterprise, talent, energy, and intellect displayed by an experienced chess player, playing within the rules of the game and enjoying that sort of freedom which the very sway of the rule affords….Socialization means the slow transformation—taking centuries to complete—of the worker into an economic functionary, and the employer into a responsible supervisory official"