Yeah I know what you mean exactly I used to hang out in radtrad mad-monarchist tier skype groups

Wait, people still care about Feudalism?

No they didn't want feudal monarchies they just wanted a monarch with authority to various degrees

a lot of them thought they would even have titles

like wt

wtf

Monarch , Dictator , Chieftan all basically the same thing

All of the internet monarchists are either English American or Russian

Some are just fancier then others

Not even british

just SPECIFICALLY English

Geesh Kombowl still typing

I see the appeal in authoritarian dictatorships but I don't know why they have to mask it in a monarchy

Eastern Europe is pretty hostile to Tsarism for obvious reasons, and western europe just viewed it as an irrelevant third world monarchy. Shilling for Tsarism, even just the historical one, just couldn't happen as an European nationalist. Even extremely religious Poles hate Tsarism for trying to enforce Orthodox state religion and sending catholic priests to Siberia and destroying churches and building Russian ones in place.

And you know, Nicholas being extremely incompetent and massively contributed to bolshevization and judaization of his country.

Yeah Nicky was a god damn retard

Yeah, that's pretty much how I feel too Bowlsta. Why do we have to do this gay "royal family" dance, just say it for what it is.

Nick was extremely naive

There was once an assassination attempt on his life while he was giving a speech and he just kept reading it. Not because he was brave or anything but because he legitimately did not understand somebody was trying to kill him

But it depends if your a Christcuck or not a Monarch is basically just a Dictator with Divine inspired authority.

You don't need to be a christcuck to accept divine authority

Divine inspired authority is still the gayest thing I've ever heard of.

Principles dictate man cannot speak for god, for it would be blasphemy. Yet these people can interpret the word of God and not be blasphemous???

fake and gay

Nick was very naive he trusted the Brits & Americans because muh WW1 allies basically and they fucked him hard.

Nicholas was incapable and uninterested in ruling and delegated a ton of authority when Russia needed a strong leader more than ever.

^

Disavowing devine authority is a post-enlightenment idea. Up until then and through all of human history rulers were considered either divinely inspired or gods themselves.

Romans did it

Egyptians did it

Scands did it to an extent

Greeks did it

^

Maybe it's my Scandinavian roots showing

I think its more Prot concept to have no hierarchical order

I understand the concept fully, you see a man that seems to "walk amongst the Gods" because he does things that are so brave, fierce, etc., it does make sense. But I still think it's gay.

My grandparents are literal immigrants from Norway I'm a third gen american.

way back when in pagan times even scandis had a pseudo divine-right concept

And at the same time he expected people to shower him with gratitude and reverence regardless of personal weakness. The unwillingness of the Russian Whites to cooperate with other white movements was the nail to their coffin, as they refused to cut their losses. Mannerheim and Finnish White Guard volunteered their support to Whites to re-take St. Petersburg from Petrograd Soviet, but Yudenich refused because that would have equaled recognition of Finnish independence, even if it would have guaranteed capture of St. Petersburg and breaking the spine of the newborn communist state.

It's prot education that tells you no such thing exists

Your concept FullMetal doesnt make sense but agree to disagree i guess

Scandinavians were only catholic for like 100 years so the concepts of Prots took root a lot better there than in other countries