And to clarify, I don't assume divine right is some crazy guy saying he's God.

The king is the king because all material comes from and is a mirror of the metaphysical and since he is better than you in the physical one can say he is better than you in the metaphysical

It's more nuanced and communally organized

Essentially

you can replace king with dictator or emperor or whatever you want

muh jesus being a carpenter

>Some people have more spiritual clarity than others as an example
t. EH
https://youtu.be/ygQ2nvmpDsM

Lol

I never understood the point of using hinduism to explain EH like I understand it works but European native religions also can foot the bill and I've even seen some EH use germanic paganism for a fill in

Because European blood-faiths are dead.

Ok that answer actually satisfies me

The thing that bothers me about neopaganism is that some of the reconstructed faiths are actually just recolored christianity pretty much, "inversion" of it, like satanism in a sense. Like you know how Frisian and some Latvian neopagans worship pretty much trinity with new names. That's not actual blood-faith. That's just basically christianity without christ.

Like there isn't any actual proof slavs worshiped chernobog and belabog either.

It's likely a later christian dualist invention.

I believe in the ideas and philosophies of EH but I consider myself odalist. I have to be careful even myself of accepting christian idealism

Not mocking you or Bowlsta when i say this most neopagans i have met dont have an authentic alternative belief system they just reject Christ from my expireience.

Besides, Savitri Devi makes a wonderful case for the aryan spiritual importance of racial separatism with the caste system and quoting the scriptures.

And form something reactionary too it.

You're right, some of the neopagans just use stuff that is completely made up, not even reconstruction, like Book of Veles.

I didn't have a reactionary acceptance of norse paganism because by the time I came to accept my pagan ideology I had already been an atheist for many years.

It's not revival of the old faith, it's a new faith with a mixture of christianity pretending to be the old original faith.

Like

I had already had my edgy rebellion phase

When I got into odalism I was just looking for spiritual truth and I looked in a lot of places before I came to it

i dont believe in anything that theres no solid proof of

back up whatever god with scientific proof ill believe it

otherwise its silly

like behaving niggers are human beings when theres mountains of evidence saying otherwise

>using science to explain the metaphysical

you know what

no you're not getting me angry this time

I refuse

Lol

not even science. any proof at all

if there was actual proof of any religion iwould believe in it

i believe in things that are real

not fairytales

your god was nailed to a cross, mine eats NUT

any questions?

nut?

Some pagans do though. Finns managed to preserve massive amounts of authetic spells, lore and rites about the pagan faith since we started recording it when the church authorities still punished people for sacrificing to the old gods. In addition to Kalevala, there's recorded 100,000 rites and spells available to everyone that were practiced from like stone age without interruption. Pity the slavs whose original faith was destroyed around like year 800, before they got a chance to record it.