LOL

@Stresbal Uh, well by that definition I’m not conservative

No nvm

I don’t believe that

Thats not the definition

Just stupid Urban Dic

@Stresbal I’m cautious to change in political, religious, and judicial matters. That’s my definition of conservative.

Hmmm yae

how about on a social level?

Social interaction changes with the progression of technology

Can you elaborate on more of what you mean?

Gender, abortion, equality between sex overall

Not necessarily social interaction

I am very conservative in regard to those issues.

@Stresbal Abortion devalues life. It’s not giving people the chance to think for themselves or do something great. Of course, I understand why you believe that abortion is a fundamental human right. The reason is that you haven’t accepted that the idea of evolution creating the world is absolutely stupid.

LGBTQ is unhealthy, Of course, I understand why you don’t believe that. The reason is that you haven’t accepted that the idea of evolution creating the world is absolutely stupid.

Changing gender affects people in a mentally and physically damaging way. Of course, I understand why you don’t believe that. The reason is that you haven’t accepted that the idea of evolution creating the world is absolutely stupid.

Also, please tag with your response.

@Stresbal

Roger

I get why you’re conservative now

And I disagree with many of the things you just said

I also doubt you have just the slightest of sources or evidence for the things you say

@Yusa

And I DO believe in evolution lul

Listen, you wouldn’t accept my sources, just like I wouldn’t accept your sources. I have plenty of sources that prove what I just said, but you won’t accept any of them because they are controversial to your view of the world.

@Stresbal

Okay show me a source why LGBTQ is unhealthy

Although I would like to challenge you to challenge your belief in evolution. I have challenged my belief in a God more then you know

@Stresbal as long as you agree that my sources won’t be laughed upon because of your contrary world view.

I will NOT laugh

But if the source is not valid...

I will let you know

But i’ll keep treating you with respect

@Stresbal But you will most likely criticize the group of researchers for reasons like “they’re too small” or “they interpreted it wrong” because you have a bias against their view even if you don’t consciously know it. Nevertheless, I will get you two sources and prove my point about you disregarding them as fiction.

No

"I have challenged my belief in a God more then you know" @Yusa Where is your "religious" role?

Having to small of a group is an actual reason to disqualify a study

Because the outcomes are not trustable

It’s basic science

So will you PLEASE show some sources @Yusa