Message from @CallMeTruckson

Discord ID: 569992476849602560


2019-04-22 21:03:31 UTC  

If we kept the Iranian Shah, Iraq would have been kept in check and Afghanistan wouldn't be a shithole after the USSR failed to invade them.

2019-04-22 21:03:53 UTC  

But instead we disposed of Shah, get the Iranian clergy in power instead of the socialists (ironically because socialists werent popular in the first place)

2019-04-22 21:04:20 UTC  

Then Iranian Clergy starts prosecuting Iraqi to no mercy

2019-04-22 21:04:25 UTC  

Forcing Iraq and Iran in a war

2019-04-22 21:04:33 UTC  

With both side of the US and USSR profitting

2019-04-22 21:05:04 UTC  

Then with USSR attempting ot support socialists in the Afghanistan

2019-04-22 21:05:11 UTC  

Iran and Iraq were both in no situation to help Afghanistan

2019-04-22 21:05:16 UTC  

thats what the world is for tech, meddling to make money for the defense contractors

2019-04-22 21:05:17 UTC  

so the US decides to help Afghanistan

2019-04-22 21:05:24 UTC  

"just focus on the guns"

2019-04-22 21:05:26 UTC  

"we will give u food and water"

2019-04-22 21:05:35 UTC  

and then once the USSR stops invading afghanistan

2019-04-22 21:05:40 UTC  

no more food and water supply lines

2019-04-22 21:05:45 UTC  

and then afghanistan is a shit hole full of guns

2019-04-22 21:05:55 UTC  

if that never happened those PMC companies woulnt be as rich though...

2019-04-22 21:05:59 UTC  

And all started because the Iranian Shah

2019-04-22 21:06:03 UTC  

the most based man in the middle east

2019-04-22 21:06:11 UTC  

had to be disposed off by socialists

2019-04-22 21:06:31 UTC  

If you seen Persia under his rule, women need not apply clothes to all of their body

2019-04-22 21:06:35 UTC  

women were free to express themselves

2019-04-22 21:06:36 UTC  

yes because america is set up like an EA game, pay to win, but in the 100 million dollar variety

2019-04-22 21:06:44 UTC  

women were allowed to drive

2019-04-22 21:06:55 UTC  

but instead the socialists were too greedy

2019-04-22 21:07:06 UTC  

and forced the shah out of his benevolent rule

2019-04-22 21:07:11 UTC  

"muh muh democracy"

2019-04-22 21:07:20 UTC  

and democracy got the iranian clergy elected instead of the socialists

2019-04-22 21:07:21 UTC  

what a surprise

2019-04-22 21:07:33 UTC  

socialism is the worst political system, besides all the others

2019-04-22 21:07:53 UTC  

The monarchy is the best political system

2019-04-22 21:07:55 UTC  

undisputable redpills

2019-04-22 21:08:01 UTC  

🤔

2019-04-22 21:08:06 UTC  

His private and public interest overlaps

2019-04-22 21:08:10 UTC  

He cannot be rich if his kingdom is not rich

2019-04-22 21:08:30 UTC  

He rules with the sovereignty that he represents all interest of his people.

2019-04-22 21:08:41 UTC  

In a democracy, the politicians are only representing SOME interest of the people.

2019-04-22 21:09:00 UTC  

Democracy Politicians are elected by Charisma and Money.

2019-04-22 21:09:21 UTC  

whereas a monarchy is elected and appointed under the social contract of the governed and govern

2019-04-22 21:09:38 UTC  

That the monarch will do his best to serve the general will

2019-04-22 21:10:15 UTC  

It is also true that the King has no opponents against him and that's a good thing.

2019-04-22 21:10:24 UTC  

Look where America got them in the issue of slavery

2019-04-22 21:10:34 UTC  

It took them 4 years to fight a war losing 5% of their population