Message from @!.MESSIEH
Discord ID: 679504737430798368
> You've debunked nothing, you can only make assertions with literally zero proof.
That's how I feel about everything you've said.
> you can believe what you want, just be honest that it's a belief at least. Don't act like you know something is 100% true
Same goes for you. You are believing in life coming from non-life. You can't repeat it and you can't guarantee me that it's true. Although you are apparently 100% sure that it is. I've given proof and methods that suit me and you have given proof and methods that suit you. Tomorrow I will have some extra proof to make a triple-logic punch. Full of links that are NOT from wikipedia or Answers in Genesis. I mean dude, just admit that life coming from non-life is a belief and not an indisputable fact.
No its fact you twat
The experiment he gave did not prove that life could come from non-life
Despite the fact that I have said that I didn't claim that the origin of life is 100% determined and that I referenced evidence for that?
He just proved that chemicals could change
Exactly
Into life
Life is chemicals
@Cobra Commander Yep. It's not even past the theory stage. It's just that, a theory. And a very unscientific one
Just think about that until tomorrow
gradual process: inorganic molecules > amino acids/organic molecules > RNA/Protenoids
A theory is a hypothesis with enough evidence to be considered fact by definition...
jesus christ *learn* about the things you try to argue against before you debate
Alright, well then both life coming from non-life and a God creating the universe could be considered theory
Equal theories
What evidence supports God creating the universe?
I'm glad you asked
Thats not the bible
oh lawd
You need *evidence*, not assertions.
Geuss he gave up
יהרה not real lol
I like how he ignored that I had already said that it's not, and will probably never, be 100% understood how life originated on Earth.
smh
וםו
ךםך
@Cobra Commander First off, an assertion: The vast amount of intelligence around us points to a creator. I mean, do you really think all of this complexity was made by random chance?
Now, proof: The probability of the chance formation of a hypothetical functional ‘simple’ cell, given all the ingredients, is acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 10e+57800. That's 10 with over 57,800 zeros behind it.
Yes i do believe things can happen on their
Own
So you don't have proof
Dude, did you see the next part?
And you probably don't understand how that's not proof.
Use a non Christian source
I linked you
I'll link you again: https://creation.com/cheating-with-chance
A source like that is biased
All sources are biased
Why on earth would you use creation.com to support your position about scientific matters?
Your sources are biased on evolution