but i wouldn’t use the 1st one

read more about that one here: https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/02/12/welcome-infowars-readers/ and somewhere on this guys site: https://necpluribusimpar.net/

You wouldn't use the first one because?

It's a massive sample size and 10 years later the data is still showing the same..

https://cdn.summit.news/2020/02/photo_2020-02-12_18-42-11.jpg

because it’s just a bunch of numbers from a blogspot

Anyway, I've got stuff to do.

blogspot doesn't make posts.

people do

correct

you don’t think I know that?

w/e man

don't freak out on me lul

all right

I’m not really good at arguing politics, but I have plenty of evidence for creation

where

Where

None of your sources have evidence for creation

https://vimeo.com/271541622

https://vimeo.com/222692365

Oh great

Vimeo
Who the fuck uses vimeo

םח

Nope stop

Don’t just say that

יהרה is gay

ךםך

that video is about ice or something?

Your last source, just like your previous ones, did nothing except frame the hypotheses for abiogenesis in a negative light and didn't actually provide any countering evidence nor suggest a hypothesis with more evidence. It's another pages long argument from incredulity, which makes the same mistake you do in acting as if scientists 100% believed any of these cases to be definite proof for abiogenesis in the first place. Which only reinforces what *I've* been saying the entire fucking time in that it's both still not definite, and doesn't matter much in the first place.

חןפפר

Provide evidence *for* creation

רןפפח

*Actual* evidence

was hoping for a study. kinda let down rn

זפפוח

hard r is banned

Did you see the other video I posted?

https://vimeo.com/222692365

Shit

פפוח

day means 24 hours